Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delhi High Court’s Jurisdictional Ruling: Venue vs Seat of Arbitration and Time Extension for Arbitral Proceedings
Delhi High Court’s Jurisdictional Ruling: Venue vs Seat of Arbitration and Time Extension for Arbitral Proceedings
August 18, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Reliance Infrastructure Limited v. Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Decided on:  14th August, 2023 +  O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 161/20

CONTINUE READING
Section 5 Limitation Act| Court Must Not Discriminate Against Government Agencies, Government Has Special Obligation To Perform Duties: High Court of Delhi
Section 5 Limitation Act| Court Must Not Discriminate Against Government Agencies, Government Has Special Obligation To Perform Duties: High Court of Delhi
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Department of Health v. Kamla Mehndiratta and Ors. Ordered on:  4th August, 2023 +  CM APPL. Nos. 20019/2019 and 20017/2019 in W.P.(C) 3

CONTINUE READING
Trademark Dispute: Physicians Or Chemists Could Be Confused Due To Common Suffix- Delhi High Court In ‘Mankind’ V. ‘Novakind’ Case
Trademark Dispute: Physicians Or Chemists Could Be Confused Due To Common Suffix- Delhi High Court In ‘Mankind’ V. ‘Novakind’ Case
August 17, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Mankind Pharma Limited v. Novakind Bio Sciences Private Limited Ordered on:  7th August, 2023 +  CS(COMM) 188/2021, I.A. 5700/2021 &

CONTINUE READING
The Delhi High Court has granted permission for a US citizen convicted under POTA to go to Chicago due to his elderly father’s illness.
The Delhi High Court has granted permission for a US citizen convicted under POTA to go to Chicago due to his elderly father’s illness.
August 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Mohd. Yasin Patel Alias Falahi v. State Decided on:  26th July, 2023 +  CRL.A. 585/2003 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KA

CONTINUE READING
[POCSO Act] The absence of injuries to a victim’s private parts does not rule out penetrative sexual assault, according to the Delhi High Court.
The absence of injuries to a victim’s private parts does not rule out penetrative sexual assault, according to the Delhi High Court." headline="" subheadline="<span class="btArticleDate">August 16, 2023</span><span class="btArticleAuthor"><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/author/anik/" class="btArticleAuthorURL">by Primelegal Team</a></span><a href="https://blog.primelegal.in/pocso-act-the-absence-of-injuries-to-a-victims-private-parts-does-not-rule-out-penetrative-sexual-assault-according-to-the-delhi-high-court/#comments" class="btArticleComments">0</a>" font="" font_weight="" font_size="" color_scheme="" color="" align="" url="https://blog.primelegal.in/pocso-act-the-absence-of-injuries-to-a-victims-private-parts-does-not-rule-out-penetrative-sexual-assault-according-to-the-delhi-high-court/" target="_self" html_tag="h2" size="normal" dash="" el_id="" el_class="" el_style="" supertitle_position="outside" ignore_fe_editor="true"]

Title: Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi Decided on:  14th August, 2023 +  CRL.A. 50/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

CONTINUE READING
Patents Act| Revocation Petition Under Section 64 Is Not A Suit Under Section 10 Of The CPC- Delhi High Court Rules
Patents Act| Revocation Petition Under Section 64 Is Not A Suit Under Section 10 Of The CPC- Delhi High Court Rules
August 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Dr Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr. vs The Controller of Patents & Ors. Decided on:  3rd August, 2023 +  C.O.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 3/20

CONTINUE READING
SEBI’s Direction Under Section 11B(1) of the 1992 Act Cannot Prevent Bank From Auctioning Defaulter’s Property In Line With Bank’s Rights Under SARFAESI: Delhi High Court
SEBI’s Direction Under Section 11B(1) of the 1992 Act Cannot Prevent Bank From Auctioning Defaulter’s Property In Line With Bank’s Rights Under SARFAESI: Delhi High Court
August 16, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  ICICI Bank v. Deputy General Manager and Ors. Decided on:  21st July, 2023 +  W.P.(C) 3796/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHA

CONTINUE READING
In a trademark infringement suit, the Delhi High Court awarded Sun Pharma a five-lakh-rupee penalty for its 2001 “Oxiplat” trademark.
In a trademark infringement suit, the Delhi High Court awarded Sun Pharma a five-lakh-rupee penalty for its 2001 “Oxiplat” trademark.
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Sun Parma Laboratories Ltd. v. Mylan Laboratories Limited & Anr. Decided on:  2nd August, 2023 +  CS(COMM) 1098/2016 & I.A.1395/

CONTINUE READING
Courts Cannot Determine Whether Agreement Is A Works Contract Under MSMED Act; Only Arbitration Can Be Used- Delhi High Court
Courts Cannot Determine Whether Agreement Is A Works Contract Under MSMED Act; Only Arbitration Can Be Used- Delhi High Court
August 9, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title:  Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council & Anr. Decided on:  2nd August, 2023 +  LPA 565/2023

CONTINUE READING
The Right to Do Business Is Subject to Reasonable Restrictions in the Interest of Public Welfare and Economic Balance: Delhi High Court
The Right to Do Business Is Subject to Reasonable Restrictions in the Interest of Public Welfare and Economic Balance: Delhi High Court
August 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: D.G. Raj Commercial Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. General Manager, Northern Railway and Ors. Decided on:  1st August, 2023 +  W.P.(C) 7222/2019 &

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.