#ConstitutionalLaw Archives - Page 2 of 4 - Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

REGULATION OF DIGITAL FREE SPEECH: X CORP V. UNION OF INDIA AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BLOCKING ORDERS

FACTS The petitioner, X Corp (formerly Twitter), contested the validity of numerous blocking orders issued by various Union Ministries and State au

Constitutional Law Evolution: Supreme Court’s Proportionality Doctrine from Puttaswamy to Administrative Jurisprudence

Abstract The Doctrine of Proportionality (Proportionality Analysis or PA) is a doctrine focused on modifying the rational partaking between means a

Supreme Court May Decriminalize Defamation: What This Means for Your Free Speech Rights

INTRODUCTION Defamation is an imperative legal matter of statements that damage the reputation of the individual where individuals, business and fa

SUPREME COURT ON WAQF AMENDMENT ACT, 2025: INTERIM RELIEF DENIED BUT CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS KEPT OPEN

Facts Many writ petitions have questioned the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 changing provisions of the Waqf Act, 1995. The pe

Marital Rape Exception: Legal Gap or Constitutional Failure

Abstract Marital Rape Exception in Indian law, has created a constitutional gap by not criminalizing the Marital Rape and sexual assault in a mar

Article 22 and the Rule of Law: A Critical Appraisal of Arrest and Detention Jurisprudence

Abstract: This article critiques Article 22 of the Constitution of India related to arrest and preventive detention, in the context of the recent S

SC Questions Validity of Ruling Exempting Minority Schools from RTE Act

Introduction The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 was enacted to provide free and mandatory education for children ag

Article 66 Breakdown: The Constitutional Framework Behind India’s Vice-Presidential Elections

Introduction The office of the vice president of India is a cornerstone of the country’s democratic framework. After the president post the sec

Kerala High Court’s Overreach: Analysing the Limits of Judicial Power in a Second Appeal

Facts Appellant: C.P Francis (Defendant No.1) Respondents: C.P Joseph, C.P Raphel, C.P George, C.P Sebastian, Desty Thomas, Clara Jacob, Kavitha An

Justice Over Procedure: Himachal High Court Rules ‘Pak Zindabad’ Posts Not Sedition

Introduction Courts have the power to ensure that all the evidence is considered and to interpret laws of free speech and national security not onl

Blogs And Articles