Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
Appellate Court Upholds Determination of Coparcener Rights in Ancestral Property Dispute: Bombay HC
January 4, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Title: Sau. Ushabai Vs Smt. Mainabai and ORS. Citation: SECOND APPEAL NO. 326/2015 Coram: Justice SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR Date: 22/12/23 Facts The case

The Kerala High Court ruled in favor of the company, applying the “reverse onus” principle and convicted the accused in a cheque bounce case.
The Kerala High Court ruled in favor of the company, applying the “reverse onus” principle and convicted the accused in a cheque bounce case.
November 1, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: POPULAR MOTOR CORPORATION VS STATE OF KERALA Decided on: 17th, OCTOBER 2023 Writ C No. – 1412 OF 2011 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTIC

The Calcutta High Court refused to quash legal proceedings against a tour operator accused of misusing booking funds, citing evidence of potential criminal breach of trust
The Calcutta High Court refused to quash legal proceedings against a tour operator accused of misusing booking funds, citing evidence of potential criminal breach of trust
October 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Ashish Kumar Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr. Decided on: 19th, October 2023 Writ C No. – CRR 197 of 2023 CORAM: The Hon’ble Just

Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition on the grounds of inordinate delay with no grounds for condonation.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MONIKA GUPTA Versus SANJAY BANSAL Date of Decision: 19.07.2023 + RFA(OS) 59/2019 & CM APPL. 19452/2022 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition and held that the Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India does not substitute its view for the view of the competent authority.
July 28, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: RABINDRA KUMAR SAHA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Judgment delivered on: 18th July, 2023 + W.P.(C) 9118/2023 & CM APPL. 34697/2023 CO

Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
Delhi High Court Dismissed the writ of certiorari and granted petitioner liberty to argue their matter before Armed forces tribunal
July 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: LT COL PRAVAL PETER RETD & ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Reserved on: 14th July, 2023 Pronounced on: 18 th July, 2023 + W.P.(C)

Delhi High Court released the petitioner on bail in the case under NDPS act and held that trial is likely to take time, thus cannot be kept in prison for long.
Delhi High Court released the petitioner on bail in the case under NDPS act and held that trial is likely to take time, thus cannot be kept in prison for long.
July 27, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: ANITA @ KALLO versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Date of decision: 18th July, 2023 + BAIL APPLN. 957/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT

The Delhi High Court: Petitioner allowed to file written statement; Can’t assume that it is not required in a divorce suit due to the filing for transfer petition before the SC.
The Delhi High Court: Petitioner allowed to file written statement; Can’t assume that it is not required in a divorce suit due to the filing for transfer petition before the SC.
July 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Babita vs Manish Shoukeen Date of decision: 18th July, 2023 + CM(M) 752/2023 & CM APPL. 23729/2023 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVI

Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
Delhi High Court Set aside the order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and held that appellant cannot be saddled with contributory negligence merely on the basis of his cross-examination.
July 26, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: DILIP KUMAR SAH versus PARSHOTAM ALIAS PURSHOTAM LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ANR. Date of decision:18thJuly, 2023 + MAC.APP. 133/

Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
Delhi High Court upheld the appeal filed under section 91 of the Trademarks act 1999, held that two parties can register identical or similar marks if there is honest and concurrent use.
July 25, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: MHG IP HOLDINGS (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS, DELHI Date of Decision: 18th July, 2023 + C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 49/20