Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Limitation is an inherent aspect of the arbitrable point, observes Karnataka High Court in a construction case
April 29, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case Name: Shivaraj Kamshetty v. The Managing Director, Karnataka State Agricultural Marketing Board & Ors  Case No.: CIVIL MISC PETITION NO.2

Interim relief cannot be seeked for an International Arbitration Case: SC
April 24, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: Ilwohnibrand Co. Ltd. V. Mahakali Food Pvt.Ltd and Ors. Case no: Arbitration case No.of 2023 Dated on: 3rd April, 2024 Quorum: Hon’b

“Standardizing International boundaries: Navigating International Commercial Disputes Through Arbitration.”
April 20, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Businesses that expand into international markets are susceptible to legal disputes brought on by differences in laws, rules, and corporate procedu

“Decision of Arbitral Tribunal to not Implead a Party to Arbitration is not an Interim Award”: Delhi High Court
April 10, 2024by Primelegal Team0

Case title: National Highway Authority of India v. Ms IRB Ahmedabad Vadodra Super Express Tollways Pvt. Ltd Case no.: O.M.P. (COMM) 455/2022 &

Zee And Sony’s Proposed Merger Encounters A Hurdle – A Closer Examination Of The Shelved Deal
January 28, 2024by Primelegal Team0

ABSTRACT: ZEE Entertainment and Sony’s Indian intended to merge to become one of the biggest entertainment companies in India. The two-year-o

Bombay HC dismisses petition which seeks for arbitration when the conciliation proceeding was abruptly terminated.
January 17, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Bafna udyog v Micro and Small enterprises, Facilitation council CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Neela Gokhale DATE :  16th  January 2024 CITATI

A single person cannot be party to arbitration when the arbitration agreement mandates joint holders to be a party : Bombay HC
January 9, 2024by Primelegal Team0

TITLE : Ketan Champaklal Divecha V DGS Township Pvt. Ltd. & CORAM : Hon’ble Justice Manish Pitale DATE :  2nd January 2024 CITATION : Arbitr

Penalty Is Supposed To Be @ 1% Of The Cost Of Incomplete Work Per Week Of Delay Subject To Maximum Of 10 % Of The Total Cost Of Contract: High Court Of Delhi
Penalty Is Supposed To Be @ 1% Of The Cost Of Incomplete Work Per Week Of Delay Subject To Maximum Of 10 % Of The Total Cost Of Contract: High Court Of Delhi
November 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: National Projects Constructions Corporation Ltd. (Npcc) V M/S Aac India Pvt. Ltd Citation: Fao (Comm) 140/2021 Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Just

To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
To prove undervaluation in customs duty cases, the Supreme Court requires evidence of contemporaneous import prices, or else the benefit of the doubt favors the importer.
October 11, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Case Title: Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai v. M/s Ganpati Overseas through its Proprietor Shri Yashpal Sharma & Anr Decided on: 06 O

The Delhi High court held that arbitrator has the power to award interest pendente lite
The Delhi High court held that arbitrator has the power to award interest pendente lite
October 3, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Title: Punjab National Bank and Others V. Ram Murti Devi and Another Decided on: September 15, 2023 LPA 633/2023, CM Appl. 47587/2023, CM Appl. 475