Victim need not be party to a criminal appeal in cases registered under POSCO: High Court of Calcutta
This was decided in the case of Avik Ghatak and Ors. vs. State Legal Services Authority [CRA 26 OF 2021] by Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan and Justice
Police personnel cannot be appointed as Jail Superintendents: High Court of Uttarakhand
The purpose of Police is very different from that of Jail Superintendents and as a natural corollary, their training and psyche are poles apart. He
Precedent prohibiting Muslim woman from invoking extra judicial divorce is bad law: High Court of Kerala
A women can seek divorce by extra judicial means and the law that exists in this regard prohibiting women to do so in bad law. This was decided in
Right for a safe road to every citizen is a facet of the fundamental rights of free movement and the right to life under the Constitution: High Court Of Kerala
Right For A Safe Road To Every Citizen Is A Facet Of Articles 19(1)(d) And 21 of the Constitution: This was said in the case of CA Xavier v. Chief
Police personnel cannot be appointed as jail Superintendents: Uttarakhand High Court
The purpose of the Police is not to reform, or to rehabilitate, but to prevent the occurrence of crime, and to punish the criminals. Therefore, the
NCLAT has no authority to prevent the High Court from considering a Section 9 appeal or any other claim brought under the Arbitration Act: Bombay High Court
The NCLAT has absolutely no jurisdiction over this Court, even on its Original Side, given that this is a Chartered High Court. The High Court is i
In a matter of circumstantial evidences, the law doesn’t require a particular number of circumstances to establish the chain, it only depends on nature: Bombay High Court
Law does not require a particular number of circumstances so as to establish the chain. It altogether depends upon the nature of the transaction. I
Transfer of challan triable by Special Court constituted U/S.11 of the NIA Act to Special Courts constituted under other sections of Act is not allowed: High Court of Jammu And Kashmir
Scheduled offense investigated by the NIA can be tried only by a Special Court that has been constituted by the Central Government under Section 11
Court cannot condone the delay beyond the period of ninety days as stipulated under Rule 4 of DHC(OS) Rules, 2018: High Court of New Delhi
The Court cannot condone the delay beyond the period of ninety days as stipulated under Rule 4 of DHC(OS) Rules. There is no provision to the afore
No interference by High Court in case of incontrovertible findings of fact by the caste scrutiny committee: Bombay High Court
Affinity test may not be regarded as a litmus test for establishing the link of the applicant with a particular Caste. Thus, the affinity test may
