Article 311(1) Guarantees Right To Fair Enquiry to Govt Employees: Karnataka High Court
Case Title:- DR. YOGANANDA A versus THE VISVESVARAYA TECHONOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY and others Case No:-WRIT PETITION NO.21705 OF 2021 (S-RES) Decided o
MVAT Authorities to undertake enforcement action in accordance under the SARFAESI Act
Case Title :- Indian Overseas Bank Versus Deputy Commissioner of State Tax and others Case No:-WRIT PETITION NO. 11733 OF 2023 Decided on:-March 21
Navigating the Legal Landscape: Liability and Accountability in AI Technology in India.
Introduction The AI innovation has reshaped several industries in India, triggering an industrial revolution and promoting efficiency levels while
Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958 (AFSPA) – Paradise under the Shade of Swords
Introduction The idea and legal framework on AFSPA (Armed Forces Special Powers Act) first originated during the colonial rule. It was further rein
Insurance Company failed to examine the officers of RTO to substantiate their claim: Bombay High Court holds Insurance Company liable for Motor Vehicle accident
Case title:- The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus Smt.Mangal Ravindra Divate
Unit Run Canteens are a creation by the Army and not a state within the meaning of Article 12:- Kerala High Court
Case Title:- Jayakumar and others Versus Union of India and others Case No:- WP (C) No.2517 of 2020 Decided on :- 4th March 2024 Quorum:- Judge Bas
Insurance Company failed to examine the officers of RTO to substantiate their claim: Court holds Insurance Company liable for Motor Vehicle accident:- High Court of Judicature at Bombay
Case Title:- The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Versus Smt.Mangal Ravindra Divate Case No:- FIRST APPEAL NO. 939 OF 2023 WITH CROSS OBJECTION (ST) NO
An addition merely on the basis of photocopy of alleged agreement to sell is completely unwarranted and unjustified:- Delhi High Court
Case Title:-PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-10 Versus SMT. RASHMI RAJIV MEHTA Case No:-ITA 984/2019 Decided on:-04-03-2024 Quorum:-HONâ
Kerala HC emphasizes the exceptional nature of discretion under Section 148, contrasts it with the general suspension of sentence under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C.
Case title: P Sreenivasan vs. Babu Raj and State of Kerala. Case no.:  CRL. M.C. NO. 1077 and 558 OF 2024. Decided on: 21.03.2024 Quorum: Hon’bl
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court makes an amendment in property dispute to guarantee the true issues raised were addressed.
Case title: Khazan Singh vs. Baldev Singh Case no.:  CM No. 274/2023. Decided on: 15.03.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Mr. Justice  Javed Iqbal Wani FA
