In the present case, the petitioner is an employee of the School of which Respondent No.1 is a secretary, Respondent 2 is the Headmistress, and Res
In the present case, the petitioner is an employee of the School of which Respondent No.1 is a secretary, Respondent 2 is the Headmistress, and Res
In the present case, the parties have agreed that the “venue” of arbitration shall be at Bhubaneswar. Considering the agreement of the parties
In a criminal trial where the accused person appears to have absconded or is likely to threaten the witnesses and tamper with the outcome of the tr
Without prejudice to the above observation, it was noted that the respondent has provided the Action History and the Action Taken report with respe
Further, information was provided regarding approval of adjudication proceedings in the matter of Varun Global Ltd. the appellant was informed that
Trial decides the fate of the accused as either guilty or innocent, however an accused shouldn’t be incarcerated unjustly for a long period of ti
The petitioner was arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. This is in connection with Sherghati PS Case No. 354
The petitioner was taken into custody under Section 363 of the India Penal Code, “Punishment for kidnapping”, section 366-A, “Procuration of
The court will not interfere in the matter of terms and conditions of a tender issued by the government unless, they are blatantly discriminatory,
Where the dispute is one of a civil nature relating to the land in question and the criminal process is being used to settle that dispute and the d