No reduction in the imprisonment for the offence under Section 498-A: Cuttack High Court
The appellant faces the trial for the offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo
Writ of Mandamus issued under, Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India : High Court of Patna
The petitioner humbly prays in this criminal writ petitioner under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 sub sections (1
Employee’s qualification plays an important role in selection process -: High Court Of Calcutta
The original applicants failed to secure minimum qualifying cut off marks, so both the respondent were not selected for the job through the intervi
Not holder’s fault if EPFO portal shows no error : Delhi High Court
The Act is a beneficial social legislation to ensure better future of the employee concern on his retirement and for the benefit of the department
The petitioners are permitted to deposit the balance settlement amount along with interest for the delayed period: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
The civil writ petition case falls under Section 5 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interes
Payment of the adequate compensation had been delayed, there is no illegality in awarding interest on the said amount: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir
As no other point which required evidence, was contended, the Commission committed no error or illegality in passing the impugned judgment and the
Awards compensation of Rs 5.04 Crore in lieu of delay in possession of land: Bombay High Court
Upheld the judgement of the Maharashtra RERA Appellate Tribunal awarding a compensation of Rs 5 Crore to the Respondent-complainant held by Justice
National Green Tribunal (NGT) imposes fine of Rs. 286 Cr. On HPCL, BPCl, AEGIS & SEALORD: New Delhi High Court
The National Green Tribunal imposed a fine of Rs. 286 Crores on Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Aegis Logi
Extending limitation period to file cases would be withdrawn from October 1: Supreme Court of India
On Thursday a bench led by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India N.V. Ramana mentioned that the April 27, 2021 order would be lifted from October 1,
The person who has an interest in the outcome or decision of the dispute must not have the power to appoint a sole arbitrator : Delhi High Court
Arbitration and dispute resolution is an effective tool to work out the differences between parties amicably, however it shouldn’t be biased. Thi
