Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Judicial Review Under Article 227: Deletion of Framed Issues and Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination: Delhi High Court

Judicial Review Under Article 227: Deletion of Framed Issues and Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination: Delhi High Court Case title: Ritu Kumar v

Delhi High Court Reviews Dismissed application on ex-parte proceedings:

 CASE TITTLE:M/S GARDENIA INDIA LTD & ANR V. DR RAKESH KUMAR (HUF CASE NO:CM(M) 137/2020, CM APPL. 4642/2020 ORDER ON:14.05.2024 QUORUM:. J. S

Delhi High Court Reduces Deposit Requirement in Stamp Duty Dispute to 25%: Pending Further Adjudication

CASE TITLE – HARI PARVAT FINANCIAL ADVISORS AND CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. OFFICE OF THE COLLECTOR OF STAMPS CASE NUMBER – LPA 383/

Delhi High Court Upholds Commercial Court’s Decision: Defendant’s Contradictory Claims Rejected, ₹5.91 Lakh Awarded to Plaintiff with 18% Pre-Suit Interest

CASE TITLE – Casa 2 Stays Pvt. Ltd. v. Comfia Ecom Private Ltd. CASE NUMBER – RFA(COMM) 187/2023 &CAV 445/2023 DATED ON – 13.05.2024

Delhi High Court Upholds Petitioner’s Appeal, Transfers Case to NCLT and Dismisses Tribunal’s Liability Order

 Case Name: Gurbakhsh Singh Ba, Buliders Private Limited v. Fortis Hospital Limited Escort Heart Institute & Research Centre  Case No.: CO.AP

Delhi High Court Upholds Dishonoured Cheque Conviction : Cited Lack of Merit in the Contentions of the Appellant

Case Title – Rajesh Kumar Jain Vs. J.C. Trading Case Number – CRL. REV. P. 222/2024 Dated on – 14th May, 2024 Quorum – Justice Anoop Kumar

Delhi High Court Upholds Lower Court’s Decision of Awarding Compensation to Claimant on Grounds of Medical Expenses

Case Name: Saliya Begum @ Sarla v. Dhiyan Singh & Ors (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.)  Case No.: MAC.APP. 964/2016  Dated: May 14, 2024 

The Delhi High Court Upholds Victim’s Testimony Quoting it as “Ring of Truth” in Sexual Assault Case: Cited Reason as Lack of Evidence to Rebut the Statutory Presumptions

Case Title – Miss P & Ors. Vs. State of NCT Delhi & Anr. Case Number – CRL. A. 459/2020 Dated on – 14th May, 2024 Quorum – Justice

Onus of Proving the service is provided for ‘Commercial Purpose’ Lies with Service Provider Not consumer: Supreme Court
Onus of Proving the service is provided for ‘Commercial Purpose’ Lies with Service Provider Not consumer: Supreme Court

Case Title: SHRIRAM CHITS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED EARLIER KNOWN AS SHRIRAM CHITS (K) PVT. LTD Versus RAGHACHAND ASSOCIATES Case No: CIVIL APPEAL NO

Onus of Proving the service is provided for ‘Commercial Purpose’ Lies with Service Provider Not consumer: Supreme Court

Case Title: SHRIRAM CHITS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED EARLIER KNOWN AS SHRIRAM CHITS (K) PVT. LTD Versus RAGHACHAND ASSOCIATES Case No: CIVIL APPEAL NO