Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
To avail the benefit of proviso to Section 142(b) of the NI Act the complainant is mandated to file an application for condonation of delay explaining sufficient and satisfactory reasons for such delay :Tripura High Court
June 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Sumit Deb vs Sri Joy Deb (CRL. A. NO.09 OF 2020) upheld that to avail the benefit of proviso to Section 1

Appropriate Authority should exercise power under Section 269 UD with great care and utmost fairness. Market value should be determined in a fair and just manner: Calcutta High Court.
June 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

This case was filled against the order passed in W.P No. 2821 of 1993 dated 14.08.2018. The said writ petition was filed challenging the order date

The term “education” cannot be restricted to formal school or college education then dissemination of knowledge through a museum or a science park would undoubtedly fall within the meaning of “education” as occurring in Section 2 (15) of the Companies Act: Calcutta High Court
June 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

This appeal by the assessee filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the consolidated order dated 14.08.2020 passe

Absence Of Teeth Marks From A 12-Year-Old Girl On The Body Of The Accused Is Irrelevant: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

Absence Of Teeth Marks From A 12-Year-Old Girl On The Body Of The Accused Is Irrelevant, upheld by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through the l

In no way No, the word no needs more explanation: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

In no way No, the word no needs  more explanation, is upheld by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through the learned Judge JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKAR

Highly improbable that a person would carry identity proof together with contraband: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Highly improbable that a person would carry identity proof together with contraband: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

Highly improbable that a person would carry identity proof together with contraband, is upheld by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through the le

Police protection granted to couple in live-in relationship: Rajasthan High Court
June 18, 2022by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Sathish Kumar Sharma  in the case Ajay Kumar v State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Misce

Live-in-relationship between a married and unmarried person is not permissible: Rajasthan High Court
June 18, 2022by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Pankaj Bhandari  in the case Rashika Khandal v. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Misc

Protection to couple in live-in-relationship refused by court since the woman was married: Rajasthan High Court
June 18, 2022by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Sathish Kumar Sharma  in the case Maya Devi v. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Misce

AS THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN EXONERATED IN THE DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDINGS, THE CRIMINAL CHARGES ALSO DESERVE TO BE SET ASIDE: ODISHA HIGH COURT
AS THE PETITIONER HAS BEEN EXONERATED IN THE DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDINGS, THE CRIMINAL CHARGES ALSO DESERVE TO BE SET ASIDE: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 18, 2022by Primelegal Team

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar in the case of Dr. Min