Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
A trade union is not entitled to any mandatory order in this writ petition for payment of the benefits under ROPA-1998 to each of its additional members: Calcutta High Court.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Judgement in the case of Calcutta Tram Mazdoor Sabha vs The State Of West Bengal And Others (W.P.O.1017 of 2022) was served by THE HON’BL

The Court always retains a discretion under Section. 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 to give a decree of declaration if it is satisfied that the an individual is entitled to a character or right: Calcutta High Court.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

The judgement in the case of Metal Box India Limited vs Jyotsana Poddar (GA 2 of 2022)was served by THE HON’BLE JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE. FA

The principle of ‘Dual Citizenship’ is not applicable in India. Hence anyone cannot claim to be a citizen of India when their name appeared in the Electoral Roll of Bangladesh: Calcutta High Court.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

This is an application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereafter described as the CPC) filed by the respondent/returned

IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT THE FACTOR WHICH DISTINGUISHES CULPABLE HOMICIDE FROM MURDER IS THE PRESENCE OF SPECIAL MENS REA WHICH CONSISTS OF THE MENTAL ATTITUDES INDICATED IN SECTION 300 IPC: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice R.K Pattanaik in the case of Anjari Rout V Sta

CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE PROSECUTION WITNESSES BEING AN ESSENTIAL RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED, IT IS EVIDENT THAT NON-CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE SAID WITNESSES WILL PUT THE PETITIONER TO PREJUDICE: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice S.K Panigrahi in the case of Pidika Sambaru v

The court allows service providers permission to execute HP Telecom Department’s recommendations for improved internet access inside the state: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

The court allows service providers permission to execute HP Telecom Department’s recommendations for improved internet access inside the stat

No coercive action taken against a journalist at present: Himachal Pradesh High Court
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

No coercive action taken against a journalist at present, who had petitioned the court to dismiss the criminal proceedings against him., is upheld

Daughter, who is now married, may be considered for compassionate hiring: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Daughter, who is now married, may be considered for compassionate hiring: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team

It is against the law to make a distinction between a son and daughter after they get married only on the basis of their gender, upheld by the High

Can A Kazi Adjudicate Disputes And Issue Orders Like A Court? Madhya Pradesh HC answers.
June 21, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in the case of Aadil v. Union of India and others (W.P No.24741/2018), through the Division Bench of Vivek Rusia and

‘Habeas Corpus Not Maintainable When Detention Is Under The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018’: Madhya Pradesh HC
June 21, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Gautam Das & Others v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh & Others (Writ Petition No.26319/2019), the Madhya Pradesh High Court