Prime Legal Law Firm Blogs

Occupant Not Entitled To Usurp Govt Land, Raise ‘Pucca’ Construction, When Under Mere Possession of Tehbazari Right : Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court ordered that mere possession of a Tehbazari right does not entitle the occupant to usurp the Government land or to raise ‘pu

A Suit Cannot Be Valued Differently By Plaintiff For Purpose Of Jurisdiction & For Payment Of Court Fees: Delhi High Court.

Delhi High Court ordered that plaintiff cannot value suit differently for purpose of jurisdiction & for payment of court fees. This was seen in

Arbitration award that is unreasoned is against the public policy – Odisha High Court.

The Odisha High Court passed an Order on 10.05.2022. In the case of Jayaram Panda v. Project Director, M/s. National Highway Authority of India and

General Offences Arising Out Of Case Probed By NIA Can Be Tried By NIA : Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that the Special NIA Court is empowered to conduct trial for general offences punishable under Indian Penal Code

The Commission that are paid to persons who are not beneficial to business of Assesse is Taxable – Odisha High Court.

The Odisha High Court passed a order on 12.05.2020. In the case of M/s. Oripol Industries Ltd., Balasore v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Balas

A Balance Must Be Struck Between Development & Ecology: Karnataka High Court

Karnataka High Court dismissed public interest litigation challenging the State’s decision to part with the water resources of Kali River and

Trial Courts Have No Bars In Deciding Issues Having No Precedent, Previously Undecided By Any Superior Court: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court observed that there are no bar on trial courts in deciding issues having no precedent, previously undecided by any superior court.

Anticipatory Bail Not Mandatory Merely Because Interim Protection Was Granted At Initial Stage Of Proceedings: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court said that it is not mandatory to grant anticipatory bail merely because interim protection was granted at initial stage of pro

Commercial Court Cannot Be Regarded As A “Person Or Institution” : Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has ruled thatCommercial Court Cannot Be Regarded As A “Person Or Institution” Under Section 11(6) Of The A&C

Simply Touching Private Parts of a Child is Enough to Attract POCSO Offence; Absence of Injury is Irrelevant : Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court ruled that the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act (POCSO Act) would consider touching private parts with sexual

Blogs And Articles