Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Delay/ negligence in filing for police custody by state police does not satisfy exceptional circumstances to transfer the investigation to CBI: Andhra Pradesh High Court
Delay/ negligence in filing for police custody by state police does not satisfy exceptional circumstances to transfer the investigation to CBI: Andhra Pradesh High Court
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has issued an order on 4th January, 2023 in which it stated that the mere delay/negligence in filing for police custo

The question of whether the enshrined rights in the constitution i.e the fundamental rights can be amenable in nature by the Parliament was raised in the landmark Golaknath case. This case is a landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India. Golaknath vs State of Punjab, 1967, Supreme Court of India, AIR 1967 SCR (2) 762. The court also looked up on a major issue of whether the amendment of 1951 which was the First amendment act 1951 is ultra vires or not?
The question of whether the enshrined rights in the constitution i.e the fundamental rights can be amenable in nature by the Parliament was raised in the landmark Golaknath case. This case is a landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India. Golaknath vs State of Punjab, 1967, Supreme Court of India, AIR 1967 SCR (2) 762. The court also looked up on a major issue of whether the amendment of 1951 which was the First amendment act 1951 is ultra vires or not?
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team

Important Aspects to Consider: The Indian National Congress and the Indian Nationalist Movement were founded on the demand for fundamental rights,

One of the cases which is referred to as the landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India is the Keshavnanda Bharathi case. This case has upheld the basic structure of the Constitution and this case has paved an outline for the same. Keshavnanda Bharathi vs State of Kerala, 1973, 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461, Supreme Court of India. The court for the protection of the Parliament and citizens of the country came up with basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
One of the cases which is referred to as the landmark case in the history of the Judiciary of India is the Keshavnanda Bharathi case. This case has upheld the basic structure of the Constitution and this case has paved an outline for the same. Keshavnanda Bharathi vs State of Kerala, 1973, 4 SCC 225; AIR 1973 SC 1461, Supreme Court of India. The court for the protection of the Parliament and citizens of the country came up with basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team

Facts of the Case: The leader of the religious cult Edneer Mutt in Kerala’s Kasaragod district was Keshvananda Bharati. In the sect, Keshvana

THE COURT WHILE CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION FOR BAIL WITH REFERENCE TO S.37 , IS NOT CALLED UPON TO RECORD A FINDING OF NOT GUILTY: KERALA HIGH COURT
THE COURT WHILE CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION FOR BAIL WITH REFERENCE TO S.37 , IS NOT CALLED UPON TO RECORD A FINDING OF NOT GUILTY: KERALA HIGH COURT
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgment on 24 February, 2023 ,stating that in a bail application , the court is not called upon to record a find

WHEN A THIRD PARTY SUFFERS INJURIES IN AN ACCIDENT, HE SHOULD NOT BE MADE TO RUN FROM PILLAR TO POST WHILE RECOVERING COMPENSATION, IF ULTIMATELY, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ALLOWS COMPENSATION :KERALA HIGH COURT
WHEN A THIRD PARTY SUFFERS INJURIES IN AN ACCIDENT, HE SHOULD NOT BE MADE TO RUN FROM PILLAR TO POST WHILE RECOVERING COMPENSATION, IF ULTIMATELY, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ALLOWS COMPENSATION :KERALA HIGH COURT
March 3, 2023by Primelegal Team

The High Court of Kerala passed a judgment on 10 February 2023,stating that when a third party suffers injuries in an accident, he should not be ma

Charge of income-tax – Cash credits – Assessee must prove the source of receipt – In the absence of such proof the Assessing Officer is entitled to treat it as taxable income: The Supreme Court
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Supreme Court in the case of Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif v. CIT (1963) 50 ITR 1 (SC), held that as per S.4 of the Income Tax Act: Charge of income

“Cross-examination is not merely a technical rule of evidence; it is a rule of essential justice” : Karnataka High Court
“Cross-examination is not merely a technical rule of evidence; it is a rule of essential justice” : Karnataka High Court
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 1st March, 2023 issuing trial courts dealing with criminal matters have to appreciate evidence as

“Wife Should Not Be Made To Wait For Years Together, To Get Certain Amount Of Maintenance From The Hands Of The Husband”: Karnataka High Court
“Wife Should Not Be Made To Wait For Years Together, To Get Certain Amount Of Maintenance From The Hands Of The Husband”: Karnataka High Court
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Karnataka High Court has passed a judgment on 8th February, 2023 issuing directions to the lower courts to follow a timeline, while deciding ca

Inciting people at large against the Rule of Law and against one of the basic wings of the democratic setup, contempt proceedings initiated: Punjab High Court.
Inciting people at large against the Rule of Law and against one of the basic wings of the democratic setup, contempt proceedings initiated: Punjab High Court.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, in Court on its own motion v/s Union of India and others (CROCPNo.2of2023), delivered on 24th February, 2023, initiated cont

Kidney transplant upheld between not near relatives to prevent loss of life: Punjab High Court.
Kidney transplant upheld between not near relatives to prevent loss of life: Punjab High Court.
March 2, 2023by Primelegal Team

The Punjab High Court, on 6th December, 2022, in Ajay Mittal and others v/s Union of India and another (CWP NO.26361 OF 2022), upheld the petitions