“Unveiling the Exhaustion of Remedies under Karnataka Education Act, 1983”
Jai Bhavani Education Society vs The State Of Karnataka And Ors 11 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble E.S.Indiresh Introduction The case of Jai Bhava
Criticisms on the Personal Data Protection Bill
Introduction In today’s digital era, where personal information is increasingly vulnerable to misuse and unauthorized access, data protect
‘Essential Ingredients To Attract Section 498A Of The Code Are Completely Absent In The Present Context.’: Calcutta HC
The single judge bench of Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee of the Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri circuit bench in the case of In re: Piyali Mandal M
‘This Is Clear Violation Of Recruitment Rules. The Board Has Maintained Total Silence In This Regard.’: Calcutta HC
The single judge bench consisting of Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of the Calcutta High Court on Friday (12/5/2023) in the case of Priyanka Naskar &
Interstate boundary dispute between State of Uttar Pradesh and State of Haryana to be settled with utmost promptitude: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court, in DHARAMPAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS (CWP-9015-2023), held that utmost promptitude must be exercised by officials of
Section 300-A upheld as a constitutional right: Punjab High Court.
The Punjab High Court in Paramjit Kaur v/s State of Punjab and others (CWP-1612 of 2020), delivered on 3rd May 2023, held that pension was a consti
EVERY ENTRY IN ACR OF A PUBLIC SERVANT MUST BE COMMUNICATED TO HIM WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD IS LEGALLY SOUND AND HELPS IN ACHIEVING THREEFOLD OBJECTIVES: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on 24.04.2023 stating that every entry in ACR of a public servant must be communicated to
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS ENCOURAGING MEDIATION TO RESOLVE DISPUTERS AND IS KEEN TO MAKE RESORT TO MEDIATION AS MANDATORY: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on 21 April 2023, stating that Government of India is encouraging mediation to resolve disputers and
Calcutta High Court Invokes Power Under Article 133(1)(A) R/W Article 134A Of The Constitution
The bench of Justice Shekhar B Saraf of the High Court of Calcutta in the case of State of West Bengal v. Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Limited
‘The Petitioners May Hold Their Demonstration At Sahid Minar For 12 Days.’ : Calcutta HC
The bench of Justice Rajashekhar Mantha of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. The State of West Bengal (WP
