Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha, the son of late Ramjee Prasad and a resident of Village Mirjapur, Nohta, Fahuha, P.S. Fatuha, District Patna, State of Bihar, handled this case.Currently opposing the State of Bihar, Chairman of the Bihar State Ayurvedic and Unani Medicine Faculty, Patna. The Honorable Mr. P. B. BAJANTHRI handed down the verdict in Dr. Arvind Kumar Sinha v. State of Bihar (CWJC No.52 of 2021).
Facts of the case
This case was a writ Request filled under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.. With this Request the Solicitor believes the Court should give the Writ of Mandamus Directing the Respondents to Release there Legitimate Commitment to Arranged the Application given By Candidate for their benefit on dated 24/08/2020 and 06/10/2020.In the case of BIHAR STATE COUNCIL OF AYURVEDIC AND UNANI MEDICINE VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS under the Bihar Ayurvedic and Unani Medicine Act, 1951, the Hon’ble Apex Court held that the GAMS degree conferred on and shall be treated as recognised degree for the purposes of taking admission to higher courses of study as well as for the purposes of employment. This decision is known for its credibility.In addition, the petitioner requests that the Court issue a writ of mandamus and direct the respondents’ authority to comply with the own resolution issued by Mr. Deepak Kumar, secretary of the Bihar government, in memo no.16/M/-1-67/2006-260 (Unani) Patna, dated March 22, 2007, and to keep the selection process as it was described in Advertisement No.04/2020 to 09/2020 issue Warning by Mark of Respondent No.3 The Secretary of the Bihar Technical Service Commission (BTSC), Patna, was ignorant of the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court and the High Court, Patna, as well as the circulars issued by the federal government and the state government.about the age and degree relaxation.In the meantime, the petitioner asks the court to direct the respondents to carry out their legal obligation to properly investigate the situation and provide the petitioner with the opportunity to do so in accordance with the law and the provisions of the laws.In addition, the petitioner requested that the court take appropriate legal action against the responsible Respondents who are engaging in such an illegal strategy of cornering the petitioners.
JUDGEMENT:
The court dismissed the petition in light of the aforementioned observations and arguments and ordered it to consider the petitioner’s representation, issue a speaking order within six weeks of receiving this order, and notify the petitioner of its decision.
“PRIME LEGAL is a full-service law firm that has won a National Award and has more than 20 years of experience in an array of sectors and practice areas. Prime legal fall into a category of best law firm, best lawyer, best family lawyer, best divorce lawyer, best divorce law firm, best criminal lawyer, best criminal law firm, best consumer lawyer, best civil lawyer.”
JUDGEMENT REVIEWED BY ROLI NAYAN.
