Case Name: FICCI v. State of Maharashtra Case Number: Writ Petition No.1813 of 2016 and Writ Petition No.1689 of 2015 Date of Judgment: 6 August 20
Case Name: M. Gunasekaran v. The State Level Scrutiny Committee-II & Anr. and G. Thangavel v. The Chairman, State Level Scrutiny Committee-II &
Introduction The fine line between animal welfare concerns and public safety has emerged as a critical issue requiring the interventi
Introduction In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has reiterated that an accused cannot confer the status of a confession to an eked-
Introduction The Supreme Court of India held that if a statutory notice under Section 80 CPC is not provided before a suit is filed against the sta
Introduction The thin line between the powers granted for revenue collection and the protection granted to the taxpayer necessitates compliance wit
Introduction The Supreme Court, through a landmark decision, again reinforced the constitutional principles of fundamental principles of h
Introduction The judgment unambiguously reaffirms the constitutional guarantee that the dignity of women and children is both fundamental and invio
Introduction Fundamentally, the courts have a responsibility to protect individual liberty and uphold constitutional standards set as limi
Introduction On 5 August 2025, India’s Supreme Court gave a landmark ruling holding the Central Government’s exclusion of educational i
We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.
Prime Legal, 4 No Fairle Place, H
MP House 5TH Floor Room No :501, PIN:700001