Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Bombay High Court Reinforces Article 19(1)(g): Freedom to Carry on Lawful Business Cannot Be Arbitrarily Curtailed
Bombay High Court Reinforces Article 19(1)(g): Freedom to Carry on Lawful Business Cannot Be Arbitrarily Curtailed
November 6, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case name: Rajinder Singh Sohan Singh v. The Municipal Corporation of greater Mumbai & Anr. Case Number: 3004 of 2019 Court: High Court of Judi

BOMBAY HIGH COURT CENSURES TAX OFFICER: AI-GENERATED FAKE CASE CITATIONS CONSTITUTE PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
BOMBAY HIGH COURT CENSURES TAX OFFICER: AI-GENERATED FAKE CASE CITATIONS CONSTITUTE PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
November 3, 2025by Primelegal Team

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND In the case of KMG Wires Private Limited V. The National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi and Others [writ petition (l

Bombay High Court Clarifies CPC Sections 24-25: Judicial Framework for Matrimonial Petition Transfers
Bombay High Court Clarifies CPC Sections 24-25: Judicial Framework for Matrimonial Petition Transfers
October 23, 2025by Primelegal Team

Facts The husband and wife wanted to part ways. The husband filed a petition before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai, seeking for divorce on 5th De

NEGLIGENCE IN URBAN PLANNING: BOMBAY HIGH COURT’S RULING IN YASHWANT ANNA BHOIR V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
NEGLIGENCE IN URBAN PLANNING: BOMBAY HIGH COURT’S RULING IN YASHWANT ANNA BHOIR V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
September 26, 2025by Primelegal Team

FACTS Petitioner Yashwant Anna Bhoir, a 60-year-old agriculturist from Sonivali Village, Badlapur (W.), District Thane, had to approach the Bombay

Vintage Car Not a Personal Effect: Bombay High Court Upholds Capital Gains Tax on Sale of Antique Vehicle
Vintage Car Not a Personal Effect: Bombay High Court Upholds Capital Gains Tax on Sale of Antique Vehicle
August 23, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case Name: Narendra I. Bhuva v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Case Number: Income Tax Appeal No. 681 of 2003 Date of Judgment: 14 August 202

Bombay HC Clarifies Validity of Entertainment Duty on Online Ticket Convenience Fees
Bombay HC Clarifies Validity of Entertainment Duty on Online Ticket Convenience Fees
August 14, 2025by Primelegal Team

Case Name: FICCI v. State of Maharashtra Case Number: Writ Petition No.1813 of 2016 and Writ Petition No.1689 of 2015 Date of Judgment: 6 August 20

7/11 Blasts Case: SC Halts Acquittal, Declines immediate custody of accused
7/11 Blasts Case: SC Halts Acquittal, Declines immediate custody of accused
July 25, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction In a notable decision, the Supreme Court has put a stay on the operation of a judgment of High Court of Bombay wherein the court had a

BOMBAY HIGH COURT CLARIFIES ‘I LOVE YOU’ NOT HARASSMENT PER SE
BOMBAY HIGH COURT CLARIFIES ‘I LOVE YOU’ NOT HARASSMENT PER SE
July 2, 2025by Primelegal Team

Introduction In the recent case of Ravindra s/o Laxman Narete v State of Maharashtra, dated 30th June 2025, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Cou

Bombay HC_ Compensation Based on Dependency & Income Instagram
Bombay HC: Compensation Based on Dependency & Income
October 5, 2024by Primelegal Team

Case Title – THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., MUMBAI THR. MUMBAI LEGAL HUB V. VIVEK NIWAS PATIL AND ANR. Case No. – Civil Appeal FA/168/2024 D

Sukhadwala v. Sohni_ Tenancy Rights Legal Feud Instagram
Sukhadwala v. Sohni: Tenancy Rights Legal Feud
October 5, 2024by Primelegal Team

CASE NAME: Soli Behram Sukhadwala Vs Nitin D. SohniI and ORS. CASE NO.: Civil Revision Application No.187 OF 2007 with Civil Application No.395 of