Supreme Court: No evidence could be presented beyond the initial pleadings.
Case Title : Srinivas Raghavendrarao Desai(Dead) By LRS versus V.Kumar Vamanrao @ Alok and Ors. Case No: Civil Appeal No(S).7293-7294 of 2010 Quoru
Report of the Medical Council cannot be determinative, when it contradicts with the evidentiary findings of Consumer Forum on Medical Negligence: Supreme Court
Case title – Najrul Seikh vs Dr. Sumit Banerjee & Anr Case no. – Civil Appeal No(S). OF 2024 [Arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 17437 o
Criticizing abrogation of Article 370 is not a Hate Speech; Intention of the accused is vital to attract the charges under the Section 153-A of IPC: Supreme Court
Case title – Javed Ahmad Hajam vs State of Maharashtra & Anr Case no. – Criminal Appeal No.886 OF 2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.11
Supreme Court clears the Sabarimala Aravana Prasadam’s cardamom sourcing
Case Title: The Travancore Devaswom Board Versus Ayyappa Spices and Ors. Case No: Civil Appeal NO.3866 – 3867 of 2024 arising out of SLP (C) NOS.
DUE PROCEDURE HAS NOT BEEN FOLLOWED BY THE DELHI LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY: SUPREME COURT
CASE TITLE: Ajay Kumar Mahawar and Ors vs. Legislative Assembly ……. And Anr CASE NO: W.P.(C) 2482/2024 & CM APPL. 10180/2024 DECIDE
NBFC Policy should be taken into consideration in interest rate matters: Supreme Court
Case Title: Rajesh Monga versus Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited and Ors. Case No: Civil Appeal NO.1495 of 2023 Quorum: Judge A.S.
Supreme Court directs to convene Special General Meeting of SCBA on lawyers’ body election process reforms
Case title – Supreme Court Bar Association VS B.D. Kaushik Case no. – Miscellaneous Application……Diary No(s).13992/2023 IN C.A.No.3
Self-incriminating statements not expected to be made under the threat of interim protection cancellation: Supreme Court
Case title – Bijendar VS State of Haryana Case no. – Criminal Appeal No(S). OF 2024 (Arising from SLP (Crl.)No(s). 1079/2024) Order passed
Second wife cannot be the legal heir without consent of first wife: Supreme Court.
The case ,Savitri Bai versus Savitri Bai [S.L.P.(C) No.33563 of 2011] originated with a complaint that Savitri Bai the plaintiff purchases the suit
SUPREME COURT ISSUES DIRECTIONS PERTAINING TO THE FORMAT OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENTS
CASE TITLE: Thangam And Another v. Navamani Ammal CASE NO: Civil Appeal No. 8935 Of 2011 DECIDED ON: 4.03.2024 QUORUM: Hon’ble Justice R
