The right to be released on bail under Section 167 (2) Proviso (a) was indefeasible right and subsequent filing of the charge sheet did not disting
The right to be released on bail under Section 167 (2) Proviso (a) was indefeasible right and subsequent filing of the charge sheet did not disting
Maintenance application decided under one statute would not foreclose the claim for maintenance under a different statute. Such an opinion was held
Cases between the parties, particularly those who belongs to the Scheduled Tribe community of the State of Meghalaya as far as jurisdiction is conc
The Supreme Court has clearly recognised the fact that reinstatement is not an automatic consequence of wrongful termination, especially when the W
The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, while referring to the judgments in the case of Union of India v. Ramesh Chand [W.P.(C.) 6115/2021 and Union of
Section 43D(2) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act read into Section 167 of the Cr.P.C in its application to cases for offences relating to ULA
The Counsel for the Petitioner claimed that, an appeal in this case, would not be an appropriate and efficacious remedy because Securities Appellat
The Informant had filed an information alleging contravention of Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act. However, the Informant couldn’t provide
Father is likely to have his own income and will not be considered as a dependant and the mother alone will be considered as a dependant. In the ab
The evidence does not prove that the accused had deceived or dishonestly, fraudulently, or intentionally induced the prosecutrix to enter into a se