Contempt Of Court – In The High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Nagpur Bench, Nagpur
Contempt of Court, or simply “contempt,” is the act of being disobedient to or contemptuous toward a court of law and its officials by engaging
Filing a Written Statement within the Due Period – In The High Court Of Judicature At Madras
The Appellant and Respondent are provided with a specific period within which they are supposed to submit their written statements. The decision da
Insurer liable to pay insurance claim even if vehicle is stolen: Delhi High Court
The issue whether an insurance company can be held liable to pay the insurance claim amount if the vehicle which was insured was stolen and unautho
“Subordinate courts cannot assume jurisdiction and issue show cause notice as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated”: Delhi High Court
The issue whether a subordinate court can assume jurisdiction in excess of its authority and serve show cause notice as to why proceedings of crimi
Weak circumstantial evidence, not a ground for bail : SC
The Supreme Court, in a recent judgement, observed that merely because the case of the prosecution rests on weak circumstantial evidence, it is not
Revision petition filed under section 397 C.R.P.C dismissed for not having locus standi – Manipur high court
Revision petition filed under section 397 C.R.P.C dismissed for not having locus standi – Manipur high court A criminal revision petition was fil
Bail application dismissed for having no new ground to support the application – Manipur high court
Bail application dismissed for having no new ground to support the application – Manipur high court A bail application filed under section 437 of
Applicability of Section 149 IPC read with Section 302 IPC, cannot be done on the basis of vague evidence and general allegations: High Court of Delhi
In order to convict an accused with the aid of Section 149, a clear finding needs to be given by the Court regarding the nature of unlawful common
The contract with the exclusive right to appoint the arbitrator is not enforceable and is violative of Section 12(5) of the 1996 Act: High Court of Delhi
No single party can be permitted to unilaterally appoint the Arbitrator, as it would defeat the purpose of unbiased adjudication of dispute between
Khalistani mentions spotted in social media and mobile phone not conclusive proof of being terrorist:Punjab & Haryana High Court
The issue whether a person who mentions khalistan in his social media accounts and has contacts saved with khalistan reference is sufficient to det
