Suo moto case to reinstate Covid protocols in flights: Delhi High Court
The need to ensure proper adherence to COVID protocol on domestic flights was upheld by the High Court of Delhi presided by HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE
If participants of a rally make provocative slogans, organisers of the political rally can be held responsible: Kerala High Court
The High Court of Kerala, through learned judge, Justice PV Kunhikrishnan in the case of R Ramaraja Varma v State of Kerala (WP(C) NO. 16371 OF 202
POCSO-S.33(1) held, lifts embargo u/s193 CrPC- Special Court empowered to take cognizance as a court of original jurisdiction, without committal of accused: Allahabad High Court
The power of a Special Court as a court of original jurisdiction in order to take cognizance of a case without committal of the accused was held by
Habeas corpus Custody of a minor with mother-Claim for custody and visitation rights by father-Substantive statutory remedy may be availed: Allahabad High Court
Habeas corpus is a recourse in law through which a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court and request that the court or
The Press shall not indulge in sensationalism: Kerala High Court
The High Court of Kerala through learned judges, Justice Devan Ramachandran & Justice Sophy Thomas in the case of Indo Asian News Channel Pvt.
Prevention Of Cow Slaughter Act 1955, a special act and local law- Powers u/s 451,452 & 457 of CrPC are not invocable in respect of proceedings under the Act: Allahabad High Court
Prevention of cow slaughter Act- An Act to prohibit and prevent the slaughter of cow and its progeny in Uttar Pradesh whereas it is expedient to pr
Private bus Operators file writ to continue tax exemption granted during COVID period: Kerala High Court
The High Court of Kerala, through the learned judge, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, in the case Vakiyath Koya vs State of Kerala & Ors. (W.P. (C)
Sorry state of affairs that the society at large still treats a girl as a property not a human being: Madhya Pradesh High Court
In the honor killing case of Dheeraj Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh (CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1597/2009) the Madhya Pradesh High Court opined that
To bring the act of an accused within the purview of Section 304 the accused must prove that he had neither taken any undue advantage nor acted in the cruel or unusual manner: Madhya Pradesh High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Naresh Singh vs State Of M.P. (Cr.A. No. 496 of 2011) upheld that the accused must prove that he had n
The information given by the co-accused is inadmissible if the same does not lead to any recovery : Madhya Pradesh High Court
It was upheld by Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Arjind Kumar Singh @ A.K. Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh (MISC. CRIMINAL CASE NO.52
