Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Reduction in punishment to accused as he has to look after his children and the incident has happened 17 years ago: Telangana High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Telangana through the learned bench led by HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN in the case o

No Evidence Against Him’: The Court Dismisses the POCSO Case Against the Bishop: Karnataka High Court.
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

 The Court Dismisses POCSO Case Against Bishop, Finding ‘No Material Against Him’, is upheld by the High Court of Karnataka through th

A person’s right to choose a spouse should not be subject to societal or legal interference: Karnataka high court.
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

It is ultimately up to the persons in a relationship to determine whether or not they are a good fit for one another. There can be no interference

Disputes between landlords and tenants governed by the Transfer of Property Act are arbitrable by character: Karnataka high court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The parties to the lease agreement, which was controlled by the Transfer of Property Act, might submit their landlord-tenant problems to arbitratio

There is a difference between “related witness” and “interested witness” as “Interested witness” is a witness who is vitally interested in the conviction of a person due to previous enmity : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Pappu @ Matiuddin vs State Of M.P. (Cr.A.No. 246 of 2010) upheld that there is a difference between &#

Percentage of burns alone would not determine the credibility of dying declaration and improbability of its recording : Madhya Pradesh High Court
Percentage of burns alone would not determine the credibility of dying declaration and improbability of its recording : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Bharat Singh vs State Of M.P. (Cr.A. No. 317/2011) / Bali Singh @ Ballu Vs. State of M.P. (Cr.A. No. 3

‘Common object’ is different from a ‘common intention’ as it does not require a prior concert and a common meeting of minds before the attack : Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Homsingh (Cr.A. No. 346/2016) upheld that ‘Common object’ i

A mere refusal to marry does not constitute an offence under Section 417 of the IPC: Bombay High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Bombay High Court pronounced a judgement that mere refusal to marry the offence of cheating be constituted under Section 417 of the Penal Code,

Copyright registration is not mandatory under the Copyright Act, 1957: Bombay High Court
Copyright registration is not mandatory under the Copyright Act, 1957: Bombay High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

While hearing  an interim application to a suit for trade mark and copyright infringement, the Bombay High Court held that Copyright registration

Extreme or harsh opinion is not a hate speech: Bombay High Court
June 15, 2022by Primelegal Team0

While quashing an FIR, the Bombay High Court held that merely because the point of view of the Petitioner is extreme or harsh will not make it a ha