Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The Karnataka High court directs a husband to pay Rs. 25,000 towards litigation expenses of the opposing party, his wife for marriage dissolution proceedings.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the Karnataka High Court through the learned bench led by JUSTICE S G PANDIT in the case of Pooja S V. Abhish

CONTINUE READING
A husband called impotent by wife before his relatives amounts to mental cruelty: Karnataka High Court
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the Karnataka High Court through the learned bench led by JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA J.  in the case of Shasidha

CONTINUE READING
An interim order restraining arrest, if passed while dealing with an application under Section 438 of the Code will amount to interference in the investigation : Tripura High Court
An interim order restraining arrest, if passed while dealing with an application under Section 438 of the Code will amount to interference in the investigation : Tripura High Court
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Jawhar Miah vs The State Of Tripura (AB 21 of 2022) upheld that an interim order restraining arrest, if passe

CONTINUE READING
The Secretary of Home Department was directed to hold a high level meeting, with all the Superintendents of Police of the Districts to formulate the advisory in terms of the directions contained in the case of Lalita Kumari : Tripura High Court
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Subhash Pal vs The State Of Tripura & Ors (WP(C) 249 of 2022) upheld that the Secretary of Home Depar

CONTINUE READING
Injury is not a sine qua non to establish the offense as defined under Section 7 of the POCSO Act : Tripura High Court
Injury is not a sine qua non to establish the offense as defined under Section 7 of the POCSO Act : Tripura High Court
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Setu Ghosh vs The State Of Tripura (Crl. A. 3 of 2021) upheld that injury is not a sine qua non to establ

CONTINUE READING
CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE PROSECUTION WITNESSES BEING AN ESSENTIAL RIGHT OF THE ACCUSED, IT IS EVIDENT THAT NON-CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE SAID WITNESSES WILL PUT THE PETITIONER TO PREJUDICE: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice S.K Panigrahi in the case of Pidika Sambaru v

CONTINUE READING
IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT THE FACTOR WHICH DISTINGUISHES CULPABLE HOMICIDE FROM MURDER IS THE PRESENCE OF SPECIAL MENS REA WHICH CONSISTS OF THE MENTAL ATTITUDES INDICATED IN SECTION 300 IPC: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice R.K Pattanaik in the case of Anjari Rout V Sta

CONTINUE READING
ACCORDING TO THE TRIAL COURT, THE CRUCIAL POINT IN TIME WHEN INSANITY HAD TO BE ESTABLISHED WAS WHEN THE CRIME WAS ACTUALLY COMMITTED: ODISHA HIGH COURT
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice R.K Pattanaik in the case of Gobardhan Pradhan

CONTINUE READING
A trade union is not entitled to any mandatory order in this writ petition for payment of the benefits under ROPA-1998 to each of its additional members: Calcutta High Court.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Judgement in the case of Calcutta Tram Mazdoor Sabha vs The State Of West Bengal And Others (W.P.O.1017 of 2022) was served by THE HON’BL

CONTINUE READING
The Court always retains a discretion under Section. 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 to give a decree of declaration if it is satisfied that the an individual is entitled to a character or right: Calcutta High Court.
June 22, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The judgement in the case of Metal Box India Limited vs Jyotsana Poddar (GA 2 of 2022)was served by THE HON’BLE JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE. FA

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.