Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Magistrate can refuse the request to issue summons to the witness on the ground that it is made for the purpose of vexation or delay or for defeating the ends of justice : Tripura High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Milan Paul vs Smt. Rikta Paul (Crl. Rev. P No.43 of 2021) upheld that magistrate can refuse the request t

If the detenu was not prejudiced by non-supply of a particular document, the detenu cannot gain any benefit merely by agitating that a document mentioned in the detention order was not supplied to him : Tripura High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Sushanta Kumar Banik vs The State Of Tripura (WP(C)(HC) 06/2021) upheld that unless the detenu can show a

‘Bar U/S 362 CrPC Not Applicable’: Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In Shivam Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others (Misc. Criminal Case No. 21851 of 2022), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench, recen

Conversion Of Wife’s Conviction U/S 302 IPC For Burning Husband To Death To S.304: Madhya Pradesh HC
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In Rajaram and ors v State of MP (CRA No.38/2012), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench, recently converted the conviction of the Appellants

‘Can Arya Samaj Marriage Bureau Convert Religion Of A Person?’: Madhya Pradesh High Court
‘Can Arya Samaj Marriage Bureau Convert Religion Of A Person?’: Madhya Pradesh High Court
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the case of Rahul Alias Golu Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others (WP No. 26227 of 2021), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Bench rece

The writ court sitting in an equitable jurisdiction while adjudicating a writ petition should also balance the equity between the parties, in an appropriate case: Calcutta High Court. 
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Judgment in the case of Shah vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors ( WPO 672 of 2010) was served by The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy. 

The delay in making the application is attributable to the petitioners and the delay could have been avoided had the petitioners been a bit more vigilant and conscious about the terms and conditions of the Scheme under which they sought subsidy: Calcutta High Court.
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The judgement in the case of Murlidhar Ratanlal Exports Ltd. & ors. vs State Of West Bengal & Ors (WPO No. 574 of 2017) was served by Hon&#

Disciplinary proceeding can be continued in spite of acquittal of the employee in the criminal case as the nature of both the proceedings are different: Calcutta High Court.   
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Judgment in Avik Kumar Sinharay vs Punjab National Bank And Ors (WPO/52/2019) was served by the Hon’ble JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA. FA

Their teacher sexually assaulted and raped underage female students. Contamination of the teacher-student relationship’s sanctity: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Their teacher sexually assaulted and raped underage female students. Contamination of the teacher-student relationship’s sanctity: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

A teacher violated the integrity of the teacher-student relationship by engaging in rape and sexual penetration with underage students, upheld by t

No worker has a guaranteed right to a certain workplace assignment: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
June 23, 2022by Primelegal Team0

An employee’s transfer or repatriation is an incident of service, not a punishment, and is within the employer’s or authority’s j