The Judgment in the case of Kolkata-Iii vs M/S. Vivada Inland Waterways Ltd (IA No.GA/2/2011) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNAN
The Judgment in the case of Kolkata-Iii vs M/S. Vivada Inland Waterways Ltd (IA No.GA/2/2011) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNAN
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (short “1996 Act”) does not give a mechanism to contest an arbitral award, which is contrary to
Couples must choose between work opportunities and family life, a judge observed in a case where a woman sought a job transfer to be with her daugh
Petitioner’s claim that she was demoted from her position in reprisal for her reporting of sexual harassment was thrown out of court, is uphe
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice B. Mohanty in the case of Kailash Chandra Pand
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Mahendar Jumar Goyal in the case of Mukesh Jain v. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal M
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Justices Jawant Singh and Murahari Sri Raman i
This particular decision is upheld by the High Court of Odisha through the division bench of Justice Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar and Justice Radha Kr
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Chief Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani in the case of Rituraj Singh Rathore v. S
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Chief Justice Govind Mathur Justice Ajai Kumar Srivastava in the case of Uday Educare And Welf