Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Existence of legally recoverable debt is not a matter of presumption under Section 139 of the Act : Tripura High Court
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Sri Apu Ranjan Debnath vs Sri Dipankar Majumder (Crl.Rev.Petn 19 of 2019) upheld that existence of legally re

Court granted protection to lawyer and his family who received threats from a person claiming to be confined in Jail: Rajasthan High Court
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Rameshwar Vyas in the case of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited v Sharda

The bail orders might influence the detaining authority in the formation of his subjective satisfaction and non placement and non consideration of the same would vitiate the order : Tripura High Court
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Tripura High Court in the case of Shri. Bishu Kumar Tripura vs The State Of Tripura (WP(C)(HC) No. 04 of 2021) upheld that the bail orders migh

Any interference in rejection of grant of fresh application / refusal / renewal of licence for firearms not warranted except when extraordinary circumstances are pointed out: Rajasthan High Court
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Vijay Bishnoi in the case of Bhan Singh v State Of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition

Scope of the provisions of Fatal Accident Act, 1855 is wider than the scope of Employees Compensation Act of 1923.: Rajasthan High Court
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Rameshwar Vyas in the case of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited v Sharda

Case’s Nature & Not The Number, Is Crucial For Initiating Externment Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh HC
Case’s Nature & Not The Number, Is Crucial For Initiating Externment Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh HC
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In Gangaram S/o Shri Kanha Ji vs. Indore Division & others (Writ Petition No.9213 of 2021), the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently ruled that t

In case, no affidavits have been called for, it is clear that the allegations made in the writ petition are not deemed to have been denied by the respondents: Calcutta High Court.
In case, no affidavits have been called for, it is clear that the allegations made in the writ petition are not deemed to have been denied by the respondents: Calcutta High Court.
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Judgment in the case of Taurus Commercial Services Pvt vs Union Of India And Ors (WPO/2258/2022) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. NI

Since there is a violation of provisions under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act. Hence  minimum seven days time has to be given for filing response to the same which has not been done in this case: Calcutta High Court.
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Judgment in the case of Santosh Kumar Goenka vs The Income Tax Officer (WPO/2227/2022) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN F

Income Disclosed Under Voluntary Disclosure Scheme Cannot Be Included With Regular Income: Madhya Pradesh HC
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In Subhash Chandra v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Indore and Others (WRIT PETITION No. 2271 of 2001), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench,

Candidature Can’t Be Cancelled For ‘Minor Errors’: Madhya Pradesh HC
June 26, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the case of Poonam Pal D/o Laxman Singh Pal vs. Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank (Writ Petition No.9338/2021), the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore B