“Forensic Science Forms Integral Part Of Justice Delivery System”: Orissa HC
In the case of Ganeswar Behera v. State of Odisha and another, ( BLAPL No. 7569 of 2020), the Orissa High Court held that Forensic Science Forms In
Homicidal Nature Of Death Need Not Always Be Proved Through Direct Evidence: Orissa HC
In Milan v. State of Odisha (JCRLA No.64 of 2016), the Orissa High Court ruled that homicidal death does not necessarily necessitate direct evidenc
Calcutta high court dismissed a petition as the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality/irregularity on the part of the respondents in terminating the contract of the petitioner, after issuing warning to do so, worth interference by the writ court.
Calcutta high court dismissed a petition as the petitioner has failed to establish any illegality/irregularity on the part of the respondents in te
If a case is barred under the timelines contemplated under section 34(3) ofThe Arbitration Act, 1940 then the petitioner cannot be permitted to take recourse the benefit of section 14 of The Limitation Act: Calcutta High Court
The Judgment in the case of Suresh Kumar Agarwal vs L & T Finance Ltd (AP/214/2017) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHAR
These cases cannot assist the petitioners for injuncting IFIN from proceeding in terms of enforcing its right under the Pledge Agreements: Calcutta High.
The judgement in the case of Aditya Khaitan And Ors vs Il And Fs Financial Services (AP/206/2020) was served by The Hon’ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI
Court below has not correctly appreciated the evidence on record or that acquittal of the accused has resulted into travesty of justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court.
Court below has not correctly appreciated the evidence on record or that acquittal of the accused has resulted into travesty of justice, upheld by
The High Court denied a plea from the school principal opposing his or her transfer.: Himachal Pradesh High Court
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh denied a plea from the school principal opposing his or her transfer., is upheld by the High Court of Himachal P
Order. 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to supplement testimony that has already been given: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Order. 18 Rule 17 CPC cannot be used to supplement testimony that has already been given, is upheld by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh through
PIL filed seeking to institutionalise effective machinery and mechanism for rescue and post rescue rehabilitation of all child labourers in the State of Rajasthan : Rajasthan High Court
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judges, Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivatsava and Justice Sameer Jain in the case of Gopal Singh Bareth v
For Parole of seven days, court asked convict belonging to BPL category to pay two Lakh personal bond and one lakh surety: Rajasthan High Court
The High Court of Rajasthan, through learned judge, Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Rameshwar Vyas in the case of Raju @ Rajkumar Through His Bro
