According to the Calcutta High Court, the allegation of custodial torture against one accused in a different case cannot ipso facto raise a presump
According to the Calcutta High Court, the assessee’s evidence cannot be unjustly rejected by the income tax agency. In the case of PCIT vs. S
In the case of Purulia Metal Casting Pvt. Ltd. vs. Asst. Commissioner of State Tax, Purulia Charge &Ors.(W.P.A. 14286 of 2022), the Calcutta Hi
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Sandeep Moudgil in the case of Mamta
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Suddhir Mittal in the case of Mehtab
This particular decision is upheld by the Punjab and Haryana High Court through the division bench of Justice Rajesh Bharadwaj in the case of Mani
This particular decision is held by the High Court Of Karnataka through the single bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna in the case of Himanshu Gupta V.
The High Court of Delhi, through learned judge, Justice Pushpendra Kumar Kaurav in the case of Sandeep Walia v. Monica Uppal (CRL.REV.P. 179/2019 &
The High Court of Delhi, through learned judge, Justice Asha Menon in the case of Pradeep Kumar v. SMT. Bhawana & Anr (CRL.M.C. 1692/2022, CRL.
The High Court of Delhi, through learned judge, Justice Pushpendra Kumar in the case of Vishesh Taneja vs. Reetha (CRL.REV.P. 1133/2019 & CRL.M
We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.
Prime Legal, 4 No Fairle Place, H
MP House 5TH Floor Room No :501, PIN:700001