Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The petitioner is not seeking any stay or restrain order in respect of the election, but only wants that she should also be allowed to participate in this election as her nomination Form has been canceled without application of mind in breach of the guidelines issued by the Election Commission as also the Panchayat Rules: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The petitioner is not seeking any stay or restrain order in respect of the election, but only wants that she should also be allowed to participate in this election as her nomination Form has been canceled without application of mind in breach of the guidelines issued by the Election Commission as also the Panchayat Rules: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 20, 2022by Primelegal Team

The petition stands allowed and disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of SMT. SHAMABAI V. PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPME

Instead of giving an opportunity to the petitioner to cure the defect, the nomination form which was once accepted, has been rejected immediately: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Instead of giving an opportunity to the petitioner to cure the defect, the nomination form which was once accepted, has been rejected immediately: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 20, 2022by Primelegal Team

The petition stands allowed and disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of KRISHNA BAI V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH thr

When the FSL report in itself is inconclusive, it cannot be relied upon and the applicant deserves to be released on bail: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
When the FSL report in itself is inconclusive, it cannot be relied upon and the applicant deserves to be released on bail: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 20, 2022by Primelegal Team

The M.Cr.C. is accordingly dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of SAYDAM V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH through HONR

Orissa High Court orders that “Tobacco & Tobacco Products” in the schedule to the Odisha Entry Tax Act include “Bidi”
Orissa High Court orders that “Tobacco & Tobacco Products” in the schedule to the Odisha Entry Tax Act include “Bidi”
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the case of M/s. Patel Brothers & Co., Sambalpur v. State of Odisha(Case No.: STREV No. 29 of 2012), bidi falls under the definition of R

NDPS Act | Possession Not Established by Merely Remaining in a Vehicle From Which Contraband Is Taken: High Court of Orissa
NDPS Act | Possession Not Established by Merely Remaining in a Vehicle From Which Contraband Is Taken: High Court of Orissa
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the case of Kishore Bira v. State of Odisha(Case No.: BLAPL No. 9629 of 2021), according to the Orissa High Court, a person’s mere presenc

Government teachers with disabilities are exempt from the “inter-district transfer” ban, according to the Orissa High Court.
Government teachers with disabilities are exempt from the “inter-district transfer” ban, according to the Orissa High Court.
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the case of Naba Krishna Mahapatra v. State of Odisha & Ors. (Case No: W.P.(C) No. 6880 of 2022), the Orissa High Court found that the ban o

A convict who has challenged his conviction under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is not entitled to the benefit of Section 436 A of the Code: Bombay High Court.
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Bombay High Court on 28th of August in the year 2020 passed a judgment against a convict who filed for an application of bail for his third tim

A reference can be made to the Larger Bench, only if the issue, though not live, is of national importance and in order to avoid prospective litigation: Bombay High Court.
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Bombay high court passed a judgement on 21st of January in the year 2021, where it passed a judgment against the referral made by the learned S

A prisoner is not precluded from approaching the bench having jurisdiction over the district in which trial court has convicted him, if the order of rejection of parole is passed in the area of jurisdiction of forum where under conviction has taken place or if a nexus between refusal to grant parole and conviction could reasonably and validly be said to exist: Bombay High Court.
A prisoner is not precluded from approaching the bench having jurisdiction over the district in which trial court has convicted him, if the order of rejection of parole is passed in the area of jurisdiction of forum where under conviction has taken place or if a nexus between refusal to grant parole and conviction could reasonably and validly be said to exist: Bombay High Court.
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Bombay High Court passed a judgement on the 25th of January in the year 2021 in which it heard a referral made by the division bench in regards

No order has been passed by the Rent Controlling Authority under Section 23-A of the Act, 1961 directing eviction of the applicant from the suit accommodation pursuant to which possession of the accommodation has been handed over to the non-applicant: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
No order has been passed by the Rent Controlling Authority under Section 23-A of the Act, 1961 directing eviction of the applicant from the suit accommodation pursuant to which possession of the accommodation has been handed over to the non-applicant: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 19, 2022by Primelegal Team

The revision is devoid of merits and is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of SHRI GULAM HUSSAIN V. AKBAR ALI t