Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Section 9 of the Black-Marketing Act, 1980 provides constitution of Advisory Boards, which shall consist of three persons, out of which one is or has been judge of High Court to be a chairman: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Section 9 of the Black-Marketing Act, 1980 provides constitution of Advisory Boards, which shall consist of three persons, out of which one is or has been judge of High Court to be a chairman: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team

This matter is placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for constitution of the Larger Bench to consider the aforesaid questions along with W.

The party seeking a divorce must demonstrate that the other party’s unsoundness of mind is incurable or that the mental disorder is of a nature such that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with his or her spouse in order to obtain a divorce decree under Section 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act: Kerala High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team

The party seeking a divorce must demonstrate that the other party’s unsoundness of mind is incurable or that the mental disorder is of a natu

A teacher is not expected to submit a frivolous writ petition of this sort, motivated by personal hatred: Kerala High Court
A teacher is not expected to submit a frivolous writ petition of this sort, motivated by personal hatred: Kerala High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team

A teacher is not expected to submit a frivolous writ petition of this sort, motivated by personal hatred is upheld by the Kerala High Court in the

Assistant Sessions Court directed to release all of the petitioners’ passports for a year, with certain restrictions: Kerala High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team

Assistant Sessions Court directed to release all of the petitioners’ passports for a year, with certain restrictions by the Kerala High Court

The monosyllabic “yes” in the questionnaire created at the time of charge framing could not, in any way, be interpreted as a plea of guilt by the petitioner, on the basis of which the Court could have found him guilty: Kerala High Court
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

The monosyllabic “yes” in the questionnaire created at the time of charge framing could not, in any way, be interpreted as a plea of gu

Receiving the certificate from the technical member of the committee would not disqualify the accused, who were not subject-matter experts, from the protection provided by Section 197(1), which was otherwise available to them: Kerala High Court
Receiving the certificate from the technical member of the committee would not disqualify the accused, who were not subject-matter experts, from the protection provided by Section 197(1), which was otherwise available to them: Kerala High Court
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

Receiving the certificate from the technical member of the committee would not disqualify the accused, who were not subject-matter experts, from th

Notice sent to the Centre and State requesting the extension of facilities to every disabled individual in need of special assistance, regardless of the degree of their condition: Kerala High Court
Notice sent to the Centre and State requesting the extension of facilities to every disabled individual in need of special assistance, regardless of the degree of their condition: Kerala High Court
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

Notice sent to the Centre and State requesting the extension of facilities to every disabled individual in need of special assistance, regardless o

The rectified spirit’s manufacture and sale by the present appellant is not a liquor to claim an exemption under Entry 47 of Schedule – I or Entry 6 Part – III-A of Schedule – II of the VAT Act. The MPCTAB has also held that in common parlance meaning of Indian Made Foreign Liquor means the liquor which is being sold from the shop having a license for human consumption which does not include the rectified spirit, therefore, it is not exempted from Entry 47 of Schedule – I or Entry 6 Part – III-A of Schedule – II of the VAT Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

The present Value Added Tax Appeal stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LIMITED V.

If the plaintiff has no knowledge, as to who is the actual owner prior and after 15th August, 1947 the year 1947 to onward, then the plaintiff cannot take a plea that his adverse possession was openly hostile to the actual owner of the suit property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

The appeal fails and is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BAPULAL V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COLLECTOR

The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team

The writ petition stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S R.K. MODI AND SONS V. UNION OF INDIA through HON