Cannot challenge a Bill that has not become an Act yet : Supreme Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The petition challenging the Rajasthan Compulsory Registration of Marriages (Amendment) Bill was dismissed by the Supreme Court through th
Digital Signature to be mandatory in Judgements: Supreme Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Supreme Court held that all members of society, including those with disabilities, should be able to access court decisions through the learned
The obligation of an advocate is to inform the court the death of the party whom he was representing : high court of Calcutta
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The obligation of an advocate is to inform the court the death of the party whom he was representing : high court of Calcutta A bare reading of
The technical sense of survivorship prevailing in Hindu Law : High Court of Calcutta
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The technical sense of survivorship prevailing in Hindu Law : High Court of Calcutta The words Survives and surviving have not been used in the tec
The duty of the court to dispose of suits in summary way where there is no possibility Of the defense to succeed even if it is tried as a suit : Hugh Court Of Calcutta
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
Click here to view the judgement In this age of docket explosion it is the duty of the court to dispose of suits in summary way where there is no p
Contract Dispute Is Dormant; Cannot Be Referred To Arbitration: Bombay High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Bombay High Court on 26th July ruled that if the parties reach an agreement, the contract between the parties is discharged by mutual consent,
Section 79 of the RERA Act does not preclude an arbitral tribunal from imposing an injunction order: Bombay High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Bombay High Court on 10th June ruled that the Arbitral Tribunal is not a Civil Court within the sense and scope of the Code of Civil Procedure,
When hearing complaints, the Insurance Ombudsman performs quasi-judicial functions and the award can be contested under Article 227: Bombay High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The Bombay High Court on 18th August observed that the Insurance Ombudsman acts like a tribunal while resolving a complaint and decided that an ins
Statement made by the deceased contemporaneously with the act or immediately thereafter is admissible as dying declaration u/S 32 of the Evidence Act as well as u/S 6 of Evidence Act as Rule of res gestae will apply in the instant case: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
This appeal filed on behalf of the appellant is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BASANT V. THE STATE OF MA
It is hardly relevant as the dying declaration was recorded by a Gazetted Officer of the State on the post of Sub Divisional Officer and the condition of the patient was also verified by the duty doctor: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team
The appeal being devoid of merits, is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of MOHAN V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADES
