Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Assistant Sessions Court directed to release all of the petitioners’ passports for a year, with certain restrictions: Kerala High Court
August 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Assistant Sessions Court directed to release all of the petitioners’ passports for a year, with certain restrictions by the Kerala High Court

CONTINUE READING
The monosyllabic “yes” in the questionnaire created at the time of charge framing could not, in any way, be interpreted as a plea of guilt by the petitioner, on the basis of which the Court could have found him guilty: Kerala High Court
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The monosyllabic “yes” in the questionnaire created at the time of charge framing could not, in any way, be interpreted as a plea of gu

CONTINUE READING
Receiving the certificate from the technical member of the committee would not disqualify the accused, who were not subject-matter experts, from the protection provided by Section 197(1), which was otherwise available to them: Kerala High Court
Receiving the certificate from the technical member of the committee would not disqualify the accused, who were not subject-matter experts, from the protection provided by Section 197(1), which was otherwise available to them: Kerala High Court
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Receiving the certificate from the technical member of the committee would not disqualify the accused, who were not subject-matter experts, from th

CONTINUE READING
Notice sent to the Centre and State requesting the extension of facilities to every disabled individual in need of special assistance, regardless of the degree of their condition: Kerala High Court
Notice sent to the Centre and State requesting the extension of facilities to every disabled individual in need of special assistance, regardless of the degree of their condition: Kerala High Court
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Notice sent to the Centre and State requesting the extension of facilities to every disabled individual in need of special assistance, regardless o

CONTINUE READING
The rectified spirit’s manufacture and sale by the present appellant is not a liquor to claim an exemption under Entry 47 of Schedule – I or Entry 6 Part – III-A of Schedule – II of the VAT Act. The MPCTAB has also held that in common parlance meaning of Indian Made Foreign Liquor means the liquor which is being sold from the shop having a license for human consumption which does not include the rectified spirit, therefore, it is not exempted from Entry 47 of Schedule – I or Entry 6 Part – III-A of Schedule – II of the VAT Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The present Value Added Tax Appeal stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LIMITED V.

CONTINUE READING
If the plaintiff has no knowledge, as to who is the actual owner prior and after 15th August, 1947 the year 1947 to onward, then the plaintiff cannot take a plea that his adverse possession was openly hostile to the actual owner of the suit property: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The appeal fails and is hereby dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BAPULAL V. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH COLLECTOR

CONTINUE READING
The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The provision of Section 16(4) is procedural in nature, and respondents should not take away the right of filing of return with a late fee. There should be a scope of application of mind and consideration of non-filing of return within time while applying Section 16(4) of the CGST Act: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition stands dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S R.K. MODI AND SONS V. UNION OF INDIA through HON

CONTINUE READING
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
The report is completely silent about the status of the seal put by W&M Department, therefore, DRP has rightly found that it is a case of ‘Major Irregularity’ and punishment should be awarded treating alleged irregularity as ‘Major Irregularity’: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition is disposed of by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of M/S GAGAN AUTOMOBILES V. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. thro

CONTINUE READING
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act provides that where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4) of Section 13: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ petition is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of BANK OF BARODA DEWAS BRANCH V. RAJENDRA SONI through HON

CONTINUE READING
In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
In the present case, even if the petitioner was found absent from duty for which she has submitted an explanation with necessary documents, then enquiry ought to have been conducted. If after enquiry the charges are found proved, then only the punishment order ought to have been passed: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE
August 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The writ appeal is dismissed by HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE in the case of STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH V. SMT. NIRMALA RAWAT through HONR

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.