TRANSGENDER HAS EVERY RIGHT TO CHOOSE THEIR GENDER : ODISHA HIGH COURT.
The Odisha High Court passed a judgement on 20.05.2022. In the case of Case Kantaro Kondagari @ Kajol v. State of Odisha & Ors ( 4779 of 2022
Where Mother Holds Exclusive Custody Of Minor, Passport Officer Can’t Insist On Father’s Consent : Karnataka High Court
Karnataka High Court ordered that the Regional Passport Officer cannot insist upon the presence of the father of the ward or for his consent for is
State Legislators are not disqualified from Holding Posts in Committees or Society: Karnataka High Court.
Karnataka High Court said that Member of the State Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council is not disqualified from holding the post of Chairma
Show details of buildings constructed after 2010 in violation of General Development Control Rules: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court CIDCO for failing to file a proper affidavit and sought details of all the buildings in violation of the GDCR Rules under the
Bail granted to 20-year-old booked after his “indifferent reaction” to girlfriend’s pregnancy led to her suicide: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court The Bombay High Court recently granted bail to a 20-year-old who was booked for abetment of suicide of his minor girlfriend a
National Highway Authority is the best judge to decide which land would be suitable for the construction of the Highways: Allahabad High Court.
The Allahabad High court observed that National Highway Authority is the best judge to decide which land would be suitable for the construction of
Record of Rights against Direction of Revisional Authority can’t be modified by Tehsildar: Orissa High Court
Orissa High Court stated that Tahasildar Can’t Modify Record Of Rights Against Direction Of Revisional Authority. This was seen in the case o
FOR DETERMINATION OF IMPLICATIONS IN LIMITATION PERIOD OF CUSTOMS ACT, APPLY DOCTRINE OF ‘SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION ‘ : MADRAS HIGH COURT.
The Madras Highcourt passed a judgment on 30-06-2022. In the case of Lalchand Bhimraj v. CESTAT, WP Nos. 34308 & 34309 of 2004. In a case where
IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY ON TEENAGERS, INDULGING IN SEXUAL OFFENCES : MADRAS HIGH COURT.
The Madras Highcourt passed a judgment on 28 April, 2022. In the case of Kanthan v State and others(Crl.O.P.No.9443 of 2022).The Madras High Court
A caste in SC list can only be included by parliament: Allahabad High Court
Allahabad High Court Quashes UP Govt Orders Notifying 17 OBCs as Scheduled Castes by stating that “A caste in SC list can only be included by par
