Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
“THERE IS NO INJUSTICE DONE TO THE PETITIONERS. THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS TENANTS UNDER SECTION 9A OF THE ACT. THEIR POSSESSION CANNOT BE DISTURBED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT. THEY WILL VIRTUALLY BECOME THE OWNERS BY REASON OF THE SAID REGISTRATION. THIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REJECT THE PETITION.” SAYS : KARNATAKA HC
“THERE IS NO INJUSTICE DONE TO THE PETITIONERS. THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS TENANTS UNDER SECTION 9A OF THE ACT. THEIR POSSESSION CANNOT BE DISTURBED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT. THEY WILL VIRTUALLY BECOME THE OWNERS BY REASON OF THE SAID REGISTRATION. THIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REJECT THE PETITION.” SAYS : KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Sri. B.C. Ravindra vs The Chairman Land Tribunal on 24 November, 2022(WRIT PETITION NO.59736 OF 2014(LR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.2744

CONTINUE READING
MDMA PEDDELER RELEASED ON BAIL BY KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

IN the matter of Shiek Mohammed Arbaz vs State Of Karnataka on 25 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10149/2022) proceeded by The hon’ble justic

CONTINUE READING
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Sri Nandeesh C M vs National Medical Commission on 25 November, 2022(W.P.No.22910/2022 (EDN-MED-ADM) observed by The hon’ble jud

CONTINUE READING
This Court is of the considered view at this stage that the first in and first out rule could not have been invoked for rejecting the candidature of the petitioner.: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Nitesh Kharga v. State of West Bengal and Ors. WPO/2799/2022, which was presided ove

CONTINUE READING
It appears from the stand of the father of the petitioner that he took the benefit of two dates of birth to obtain two separate documents, for the reason best known to him: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Anirban @ Anirban Basu v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Anr. WPO/3056/202

CONTINUE READING
Considering all aspects, the prayer for temporary injunction being GA No. 2 of 2022 is disposed of: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of In the Goods of Shri Dhirendra Mohan Ojha v. Mukti Ojha and Ors. IA NO. GA/2/2022, w

CONTINUE READING
I am of the opinion that prayer and contention of the application is nothing to prejudice the judgment-debtor in any manner: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Star Vincom Pvt. Ltd v. K.L Pvt Ltd, IA No. GA/1/2022 before Honourable Justi

CONTINUE READING
NEEDLESS TO STATE THAT IN CASE THE PETITIONER IS FOUND ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE UNDER THE PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED QUOTA, HE SHALL BE ENTITLED TO PARTICIPATE IN MOP-UP ROUND OF COUNSELING SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
NEEDLESS TO STATE THAT IN CASE THE PETITIONER IS FOUND ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE UNDER THE PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED QUOTA, HE SHALL BE ENTITLED TO PARTICIPATE IN MOP-UP ROUND OF COUNSELING SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 13, 2022by Primelegal Team

In the matter of Mr. Nayeem Ur Rahaman vs The Chief Secretary on 25 November, 2022(W.P.No.22873/2022 (EDN-RES) the writ petition, the petitioner in

CONTINUE READING
Hearing On Sentence- Non-Compliance Of S.235(2) CrPC Amounts To ‘Bypassing’ An Important Stage Of Trial, Not Mere Irregularity Curable U/S 465: Gauhati High Court.
December 13, 2022by Primelegal Team

The Gauhati High Court on decided on 31st January 2022 has, while hearing a criminal appeal recently, held that the trial court has to hear a convi

CONTINUE READING
In Bogus Purchase Assessment Officer cannot reject reply without recording satisfaction: Gauhati High Court
December 13, 2022by Primelegal Team

Gauhati High Court on 11th may 2022, held that on In Bogus Purchase Assessment Officer cannot reject reply without recording satisfaction, This was

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.