Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Moreover the act of charging interest at different rates on different periods, goes to show non-application of mind by respondent authority.: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The statement was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Bmw Industries Ltd vs Uco Bank & Ors, WPO 146 of 2020 presided over by Justi

CONTINUE READING
Customs Summons u/s 108 directly to Managing Director untenable: Guwahati High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Guwahati High Court on 18th May 2022 said Summoning of the MD should be take on only as a last resort in cases where assesses are not cooperating o

CONTINUE READING
Section 173 of CrPC does not prescribe piecemeal investigation: Gauhati High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Gauhati High Court on 27th October 2022 said that Sec 173 of the CrPC does not prescribe piecemeal investigation & filing of incomplete charge

CONTINUE READING
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri Nandeesh C M vs National Medical Commission on 25 November, 2022(W.P.No.22910/2022 (EDN-MED-ADM) observed by The hon’ble jud

CONTINUE READING
ACCUSED FLATLY DENIED TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND AS SUCH, WE ARE LEFT WITH NO CHOICE BUT TO HOLD THE ACCUSED-RESPONDENT GUILTY FOR AN ACT OF WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF THIS COURT SYAS: KARNATAKA HC
ACCUSED FLATLY DENIED TO COMPLY THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND AS SUCH, WE ARE LEFT WITH NO CHOICE BUT TO HOLD THE ACCUSED-RESPONDENT GUILTY FOR AN ACT OF WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THIS COURT AND COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF THIS COURT SYAS: KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri A N Ravi Kumar vs Sri B Manjunath on 24 November, 2022(C. C. C. NO. 663 OF 2022 (CIVIL)) presided by THE HON’BLE JUSTICE Chi

CONTINUE READING
“THERE IS NO INJUSTICE DONE TO THE PETITIONERS. THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS TENANTS UNDER SECTION 9A OF THE ACT. THEIR POSSESSION CANNOT BE DISTURBED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT. THEY WILL VIRTUALLY BECOME THE OWNERS BY REASON OF THE SAID REGISTRATION. THIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REJECT THE PETITION.” SAYS : KARNATAKA HC
“THERE IS NO INJUSTICE DONE TO THE PETITIONERS. THEY HAVE BEEN REGISTERED AS TENANTS UNDER SECTION 9A OF THE ACT. THEIR POSSESSION CANNOT BE DISTURBED IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT. THEY WILL VIRTUALLY BECOME THE OWNERS BY REASON OF THE SAID REGISTRATION. THIS IS SUFFICIENT TO REJECT THE PETITION.” SAYS : KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri. B.C. Ravindra vs The Chairman Land Tribunal on 24 November, 2022(WRIT PETITION NO.59736 OF 2014(LR) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.2744

CONTINUE READING
MDMA PEDDELER RELEASED ON BAIL BY KARNATAKA HC
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

IN the matter of Shiek Mohammed Arbaz vs State Of Karnataka on 25 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10149/2022) proceeded by The hon’ble justic

CONTINUE READING
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
SEATS RESERVED FOR DISABILITY QUOTA NOT GIVEN KARNATAKA HC GRANTS JUSTICE BY GIVING THEM A CHANCE TO APPEAR FOR ROUNDS
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri Nandeesh C M vs National Medical Commission on 25 November, 2022(W.P.No.22910/2022 (EDN-MED-ADM) observed by The hon’ble jud

CONTINUE READING
This Court is of the considered view at this stage that the first in and first out rule could not have been invoked for rejecting the candidature of the petitioner.: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Nitesh Kharga v. State of West Bengal and Ors. WPO/2799/2022, which was presided ove

CONTINUE READING
It appears from the stand of the father of the petitioner that he took the benefit of two dates of birth to obtain two separate documents, for the reason best known to him: Calcutta High Court
December 14, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Anirban @ Anirban Basu v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Anr. WPO/3056/202

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.