Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The written words in the Judgments of the Courts and the provisions of right to life, as enshrined in the Indian Constitution, will remain dead letter, if action against erring police officers is not taken by the administration : The Uttarakhand High Court
December 19, 2022by Primelegal Team0

the Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 24th September 2022 in the case Bharathi v. State of Uttarakhand (Writ Petition (Criminal) No.924

CONTINUE READING
Right to property has to be viewed with a different mindset than the mindset which was prevalent during the period when the concept of eminent domain was the embodied provision of fundamental rights : The Uttarakhand High Court
December 19, 2022by Primelegal Team0

the Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 1st April 2021 in the case Rajesh sah and others v. state of Uttarakhand (writ petition no. 170 of

CONTINUE READING
THE PLIGHT OF A LONELY WOMAN UNDERTAKING TRAVEL FROM BENGALURU TO CHIKMAGALUR IS QUITE DIFFERENT FROM HUSBAND OR ANY OTHER MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY COMING TO BENGALURU FROM CHIKMAGALUR SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
THE PLIGHT OF A LONELY WOMAN UNDERTAKING TRAVEL FROM BENGALURU TO CHIKMAGALUR IS QUITE DIFFERENT FROM HUSBAND OR ANY OTHER MEMBER OF HIS FAMILY COMING TO BENGALURU FROM CHIKMAGALUR SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 19, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri. Rahamathulla Khan vs Smt. Umme Salma on 22 November, 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 4878 OF 2021 C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.8940 OF

CONTINUE READING
THE GROUND OF PARITY CANNOT BE MADE APPLICABLE TO THE CASE IN HAND CONSIDERING THE SPECIFIC OVERT-ACT ALLEGED BY THE PRESENT PETITIONERS SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
THE GROUND OF PARITY CANNOT BE MADE APPLICABLE TO THE CASE IN HAND CONSIDERING THE SPECIFIC OVERT-ACT ALLEGED BY THE PRESENT PETITIONERS SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 19, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of SRI SUBRAMANI @ SUBRAMANI RAO VS STATE OF KARNATAKA ON 22 NOVEMBER 2022(CRIMINAL PETITION NO.9099 OF 2022) presided by THE HONR

CONTINUE READING
Nature and character of subject matter have to be preserved for the effective adjudication of the issues to the suit: the Uttarakhand high court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand high court passed a judgement on 24th September 2022 in the case C.S Rawat and Shri Yogesh Tiwari v. Shri Animesh Singh (writ appea

CONTINUE READING
Irrespective of the Personal Rights of a person or a community, it can under no set of circumstances, override the rights or need of the defence of the country: The Uttarakhand high court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand High Court passed a judgement on 4th of March, 2022 in which it subdued the queries of a division bench, which had a query arising

CONTINUE READING
We are of the view that since a notice under Section 400(1) has been issued, the same should be carried to its logical conclusion in accordance with law: Calcutta High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Hamidul Haque v. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors. IA No. GA/1/2022 with OCOT/5

CONTINUE READING
The Tribunal has been thorough with regards to facts and has done a commendable job in contractual facilitation while keeping disputes for future deliberation: Calcutta High Court
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case Gainwell Commosales Private Limited v. Minsol Limited, APO / 74 /2022 before

CONTINUE READING
EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE “PUBLIC SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE KL ACT, THEY ARE NOT “GOVERNMENT SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAID ACT AS WELL AS CCA RULES SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY BE “PUBLIC SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE KL ACT, THEY ARE NOT “GOVERNMENT SERVANTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SAID ACT AS WELL AS CCA RULES SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In this matter S G Padmanabha vs State Of Karnataka on 22 November, 2022( W.P. No.50413 OF 2019 (GM-KLA)) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

CONTINUE READING
IF THE PETITIONER IS WILLING TO SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS TO THE AUTHORITY, AS INFORMED BY THE AUTHORITY AND REFERRED TO IN THE COMMUNICATION, THEN THESE DOCUMENTS MAYBE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY WITHIN 10 DAYS FROM TODAY. IF THE PETITIONER FAILS TO SUBMIT ANY DOCUMENT WITHIN ONE WEEK FROM TODAY, THE RESPONDENTS/AUTHORITIES ARE AT LIBERTY TO TAKE DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER ON THE MATERIAL WHICH IS AVAILABLE WITH THE AUTHORITY SAYS KARNATAKA HC
IF THE PETITIONER IS WILLING TO SUBMIT THE DOCUMENTS TO THE AUTHORITY, AS INFORMED BY THE AUTHORITY AND REFERRED TO IN THE COMMUNICATION, THEN THESE DOCUMENTS MAYBE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY WITHIN 10 DAYS FROM TODAY. IF THE PETITIONER FAILS TO SUBMIT ANY DOCUMENT WITHIN ONE WEEK FROM TODAY, THE RESPONDENTS/AUTHORITIES ARE AT LIBERTY TO TAKE DECISION ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER ON THE MATERIAL WHICH IS AVAILABLE WITH THE AUTHORITY SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 16, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Sri K R Narappa vs The Principal Secretary on 23 November, 2022(WRIT PETITION NO.21215 OF 2022 (GM-MMS) presided by THE HON’

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.