Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Thiruvarur Hospital Can Recover ₹5 Lakh Compensation Amount From Doctors, Officials In Medical Negligence Case: Madras High Court
Thiruvarur Hospital Can Recover ₹5 Lakh Compensation Amount From Doctors, Officials In Medical Negligence Case: Madras High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

Madras High Court Rules That Thiruvarur Hospital Can Recover 5 Lakh In Compensation From Doctors And Officials In Medical Negligence Case The Madra

CONTINUE READING
Chhattisgarh Rent Control Act | ‘Accommodation’ U/S 2 Includes Superstructures: High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In a recent ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court determined that a superstructure is within the scope of the term “accommodation” as def

CONTINUE READING
There cannot be any set of rules or guidelines, which may apply in all cases, under all the circumstances for evaluation of evidence. Evaluation of evidence is a matter, which differs with case to case and even in some cases, it differs from witness to witness: The Uttarakhand high court
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on 11th January 2019 in the case Rajesh v. state of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2015).

CONTINUE READING
It is always open to the applicants to avail their legal remedies against any such action taken by the Government. That would, however, not justify their being granted leave to prefer an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge, since they cannot be said to be aggrieved thereby: The high court of Uttarakhand
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on Veronica Lal and others v. state of Uttarakhand and others (Special appeal no. 55 of 2019) . th

CONTINUE READING
The Court is of the considered opinion that State permission is required in order to bind the State with the financial responsibility for the appointments to the posts created pursuant to Government Order
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Sk. Bashiar Rahaman Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors., WPA 2186 of 2016 was pr

CONTINUE READING
In my humble opinion, the victim girl is entitled to compensation and considering the facts and circumstances I award a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- to be given to the victim within one month from this day: Calcutta High Court
December 28, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Digantan Mukherjee v. Raju Roy and Anr, CRA 512 of 2018 before the Honoura

CONTINUE READING
There cannot be any set of rules or guidelines, which may apply in all cases, under all the circumstances for evaluation of evidence. Evaluation of evidence is a matter, which differs with case to case and even in some cases, it differs from witness to witness: The Uttarakhand high court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on 11th January 2019 in the case Rajesh v. state of Uttarakhand (Criminal Appeal No. 01 of 2015).

CONTINUE READING
There cannot be a revival of an abated proceeding, which had been abated by operation of law, by giving a judicial verdict to revive abated proceedings, before the Settlement Commission: The high court of Uttarakhand
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgement on 19th april 2022 in the case of M/S Doon Defence Academy and others v. The Central Board of Indi

CONTINUE READING
The point of maintainability, as raised by Mr. Majumdar, is kept open to be decided at the time of final hearing of the present application: Calcutta High Court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Subhra Mukhyapadhya and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors. IA NO: GA/1/2022In WPO/187/2

CONTINUE READING
Where two views are possible and the assessing officer has taken one view with which the CIT does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order, unless the view taken by the assessing officer is unsustainable under law.: Calcutta High Court
December 27, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner v. M/S Britianna Industries Limited of Income Tax 1

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.