Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
The courts evolved a jurisprudence of compassion. Procedural propriety was to move over giving place to substantive concerns of the deprivation of rights: Calcutta High Court
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Calcutta High Court opined the above in the case of Anindya Sundar Das vs State Of West Bengal And Ors, WPA (P) 588 of 2022 which was presided

CONTINUE READING
The issue of title and entitlement of the appellant to have possession of the entire 1st floor of the premises is a factual dispute for which the appellant is required to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law: Calcutta High Court
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Calcutta High Court opined the above-mentioned in the case of Arun Kumar Sadhu vs The State Of West Bengal And Ors, MAT 1365 of 2022 With CAN 1

CONTINUE READING
THE COMMISSIONER HAS COMMITTED AN ERROR IN FIXING THE LIABILITY ON THE INSURED INSTEAD OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
THE COMMISSIONER HAS COMMITTED AN ERROR IN FIXING THE LIABILITY ON THE INSURED INSTEAD OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY: SAYS KARNATAKA HC
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Shivanna @ Shivamurthy vs G M Thippeswamy on 22 November, 2022( M.F.A.NO.2911/2017 (WC)) presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

CONTINUE READING
TRIBUNAL AWARDS LESS DAMAGES, THE KARNATAKA HC GIVES JUSTICE BY AWARDING MORE
TRIBUNAL AWARDS LESS DAMAGES, THE KARNATAKA HC GIVES JUSTICE BY AWARDING MORE
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Kumaraswamy vs The Executive Engineer (Elec) on 22 November, 2022(M.F.A.NO.3585/2017 (MV–I)) presided by THE HON’BLE M

CONTINUE READING
IN VIEW OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF KISHAN GOPAL (SUPRA), THE VERY CONTENTION OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT INTEREST HAS TO BE REDUCED TO 6% CANNOT BE ACCEPTED AND HENCE THE INTEREST IS AWARDED AT THE RATE OF 9% PER ANNUM SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
IN VIEW OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF KISHAN GOPAL (SUPRA), THE VERY CONTENTION OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT INTEREST HAS TO BE REDUCED TO 6% CANNOT BE ACCEPTED AND HENCE THE INTEREST IS AWARDED AT THE RATE OF 9% PER ANNUM SAYS: KARNATAKA HC
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

In the matter of Regional Manager vs Geetha on 22 November, 2022 presided by THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH state thatThis m.F.A is off

CONTINUE READING
While exercising the power of judicial review, the High Court should not readily accept the charge of malus animus laid against the State and its functionaries. The burden to prove the charge of malafides is always on the person who moves the court for invalidation of the action of the State and/or its agencies and instrumentalities on the ground that the same is vitiated due to malafides: The Uttarakhand High Court
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Uttarakhand high court Passed a Judgement on 19th march 2019 in the case Dr. Praveen v. Director General, Indian Council of Forestry Research &

CONTINUE READING
Merely, because of non- examination of the plaintiff in the proceedings of the suit it will not disentitle the plaintiff from getting the relief which is otherwise he or she is able to substantiate by way of other evidences on record and oral testimony of the witness on record: the Uttarakhand high court
December 30, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The high court of Uttarakhand passed a judgment on 16th February 2019 in the case Devkinandan Bhatt & Another v. Smt. Krishna Tiwari & Othe

CONTINUE READING
All of these lead this court to the conclusion that it would be unlawful and grossly misuse the court’s process to allow the criminal prosecution against the petitioner to move forward: Calcutta High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Afshan Meerza vs The State Of West Bengal & Anr, C.R.R. 1484 of 2016 With CRAN 9

CONTINUE READING
No evidence was collected by the CBI to prove the above ingredients against the A-2.In considering the entire circumstances I am of view that the charge labelled against the A-2 by the CBI can not prove her guilt in trial: Calcutta High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The above-mentioned was opined by the Calcutta High Court in the case of Shri Sushanta Dasgupta and Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation, C.R.R.

CONTINUE READING
Sharon Murder Case, High Court Dismisses Bail Application Of Greeshma’s Mother: Kerela High Court
Sharon Murder Case, High Court Dismisses Bail Application Of Greeshma’s Mother: Kerela High Court
December 29, 2022by Primelegal Team0

The Kerala High Court, on Wednesday, dismissed the petition seeking Bail moved by Greeshma’s mother Sindhu, who is one of the accused booked

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.