Court Acquits Accused of Double Murder: Allahabad High Court
JAIL APPEAL No. – 1545 of 2019 Minni @ Meena v. The State of U.P. Bench: Justices Ramesh Sinha and Saroj Yadav Indian Penal Code Section 3
PIL Against ‘Adipurush’ Movie: Allahabad High Court Issues Notice To CBFC
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) NO. – 728 OF 2022 KULDEEP TIWARI AND ANOTHER VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS QUORUM: CHIEF JUSTICE RAJESH BIND
It will be considered as violation of privacy if husband seeks mobile tower location of wife’s lover to prove adultery: Karnataka High Court
The Karnataka High Court has said on 30.11.2022 under Justice M Nagaprasanna in VS v. PKR & ANR. (WP 13165 of 2019) that disclosure of mobile t
‘If He Isn’t A Gangster, No One In The Country Is’: Mukhtar Ansari’s Bail Application in Gangster Act Case Rejected: Allahabad High Court
CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION FOR BAIL NO. 11290 OF 2022 MOKHTAR ANSARI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH HON’BLE DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J. INDIAN
Is a Complaint of Non-Compliance with an Agreement for Assured Return with a Builder Maintainable Under the RERA Act: Allahabad High Court to decide
WRIT C No. 11108 of 2020 CASE TITLE: MS. MEENA GUPTA V. M/S ONE PLACE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. VARANASI, U.P. AND ANOTHER BENCH: JUSTICE SAUR
Consenting adults are free to live together without familial intervention: Allahabad High Court
WRIT C No. 11108 of 2020 Kamini Devi and Another V Respondent: State Of U.P. And 4 Others Quorum: JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA AND JUSTICE PRA
The judgment of acquittal has been assailed by the appellant on the ground that the learned trial court has not rightly appreciated the evidence available on record.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which the court dismissed the plea of the appellant and
This Court has no hesitation to hold that the respondents have violated the principle of natural justice that no one should be condemned unheard.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which the respondent was held responsible for terminati
The total value of the suit and the counter-claim is less than Rs. 2 crores, it is hereby directed that in terms of Delhi High Court Notification No.27187/DHC/Orgl. Dated 24.11.2015, this suit is transferred to the District Courts to be tried in accordance with law: Delhi High Court
CS(OS) 1504/2008 & I.A. 155/2009, I.A. 7249/2009 M/S ENGINEERING SYNDICATE vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ( Northern Divisio
The role assigned to the present applicant and the period of custody already undergone, this Court feels that the applicant is entitled for grant of bail: Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN. 2782/2022 MOHD JUNAID QURESHI vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) The bail application was filed under section 439 (Special powers of High Cour
