PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) NO. – 576 OF 2020 ADARSH BHUSHAN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH BENCH: CHIEF JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL AND JUSTICE J. J.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) NO. – 576 OF 2020 ADARSH BHUSHAN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH BENCH: CHIEF JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL AND JUSTICE J. J.
Whether complainant’s revision against dismissal of his complaint, can be decided without giving an opportunity of hearing to the accused petitio
APPLICATION U/S 482 NO.42 OF 2023 ARVIND KEJRIWAL V. STATE OF U.P. BENCH: JUSTICE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN FACTS OF THE CASE Justice Rajesh Singh Ch
The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 15th of December, 2022 in which the court has increased the amount of compensatio
The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 30th of December, 2022 in which the court upheld the judgement of the trial court
The Karnataka High court said under Justice Umesh M Adiga in Venkataraya S Nayak v. D Vijaygopal Mallya(Regular Second Appeal No. 1035 of 2007) a p
BAIL APPLN. 2779/2022 VIVEK PANDEY vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR. The current application was filed under Section 439 (Special powers of H
BAIL APPLN. 672/2022 PARAMJIT SINGH GULATI vs DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE The current bail application was filed under Section 439 (Speci
Primary objective of parole is to facilitate family ties being maintained and cannot be rejected on flimsy grounds: Rajasthan High Court The Rajast
Whether candidates who did not study ‘Language as an optional subject in their 3-year degree course studied it later as an additional subject pos