Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Bail granted to the accused on the payment of GST Evasion amount: Rajasthan High Court
Bail granted to the accused on the payment of GST Evasion amount: Rajasthan High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Bail granted to the accused on the payment of GST Evasion amount: Rajasthan High Court The Rajasthan High Court passed a judgement on 06-01-2023 in

No separate category for physically handicapped in reservation: Rajasthan High Court
No separate category for physically handicapped in reservation: Rajasthan High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

No separate category for physically handicapped in reservation: Rajasthan High Court The Rajasthan High Court passed a judgement on 16-05-2014 in t

Agreement entered into between a Hindu couple to give their unborn child in adoption to a Muslim couple is not allowed: Karnataka High Court
Agreement entered into between a Hindu couple to give their unborn child in adoption to a Muslim couple is not allowed: Karnataka High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice B Veerappa & Justice K.M. Hemalekha in Shahista & Others v. The State (Miscellaneous First Appeal No

If a certain act has not taken place in Public view, then Offence U/S 3(u) SC-ST Act For Promoting Hatred Against Community is Not Attracted: Karnataka High Court
If a certain act has not taken place in Public view, then Offence U/S 3(u) SC-ST Act For Promoting Hatred Against Community is Not Attracted: Karnataka High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice M Nagaprasanna in Dr MG Bhat and others v. State of Karnataka & ANR(WP 11949 of 2022 C/W WP 12182 of 202

Sentence Imposition by the Special court under POCSO act cannot be lower than the minimum punishment prescribed: Karnataka High Court
Sentence Imposition by the Special court under POCSO act cannot be lower than the minimum punishment prescribed: Karnataka High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice V. Shrishananda in State of Karnataka and Shaikh Rouf (Criminal Appeal No. 200060/2016) increased the five-y

The Rules, to reiterate, do not provide for any prohibition for holding the licence in form JKEL-2 in conjunction with Form JKEL-6 and, therefore, the very premise, on which the petitioner has been disqualified and his bid amount forfeited, is illegal and contrary to law: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 17th of November, 2022 in which the petition was allowed and the impugned order w

I am of the considered view that the Excise Commissioner has proceeded totally on the wrong premise and has passed the impugned order which is clearly not sustainable in law.: Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
January 23, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court passed a judgement on the 17th of November, 2022 in which the petition was upheld and the impugned order wa

The Magistrate cannot decide the validity of the caste certificate, only the caste verification committee can: Karnataka High Court
The Magistrate cannot decide the validity of the caste certificate, only the caste verification committee can: Karnataka High Court
January 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice Hemant Chandangoudar in S Neelakantappa And State of Karnataka & ANR(Criminal Petition No. 6915/2016) ha

There must be a specific allegation that the accused had induced the informant to subscribe to the portal with an intention to cheat so as to make them liable: Karnataka High Court
There must be a specific allegation that the accused had induced the informant to subscribe to the portal with an intention to cheat so as to make them liable: Karnataka High Court
January 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

The Karnataka High Court under Justice Hemant Chandangouda in Vijay Kumar & ANR And State of Karnataka(Writ Petition No. 29340 of 2017)  dismi

The argument made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the relationship of the appellant and the victim was consensual is immaterial as a minor is incapable of giving consent: Delhi High Court
The argument made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the relationship of the appellant and the victim was consensual is immaterial as a minor is incapable of giving consent: Delhi High Court
January 20, 2023by Primelegal Team0

CRL.A. 485/2020 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 264/2022 SURJEET KUMAR vs STATE This was an appeal for setting aside the judgement dated 21.11.2019 and the orde