High Court Of Andhra Pradesh’s Review On Extending Retirement Age for Bank Employees
Case title: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy & Ors. Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Case No.: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 C
Andhra Pradesh High Court’s in-depth investigation of writ petitions challenging the relocation of polling stations.
Case title: Dr. Chadalavada Aravinda Babu and Ors. VS. The Election Commission of India, and Ors. Case no: WRIT PETITION No. 26889 of 2023 ALONG WI
Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Government’s Decision in Determining Retirement Age for Cooperative Central Bank Employees
Case title: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy and Ors. VS. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. Case no: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 Order
“Timely Transplant: Upholding Efficiency and Clarity in Organ Donation Processes”
Case Title: Amar Singh Bhatia & Anr. Versus Sir Ganga Ram Hospital & Ors., Case No: W.P.(C) 3590/2020 Decided on: 20th May , 2024 Quorum: T
Decision taken by the Bank cannot be said to be arbitrary or perverse or unreasonable as to become unsustainable: High Court Of Andra Pradesh
CASE TITTLE: Sri Puvvada Venkata Mohana Murali Krishna Murthy V The State of Andhra Pradesh, CASE NO: W.P. No.4861 of 2018 DATED ON: .05.2024 QUO
Intriguing insights from a landmark court decision on interpreting limitation and acknowledgment.
Case Title: M/S VOIR INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Versus M/S POLYBLENDS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Case No: C.R.P.
“Justice Prevails: Delhi High Court Upholds Detention in Serious Kidnapping and Ransom Case”
Case Title: RAJU Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Case No: BAIL APPLN. 2791/2023 Decided on: 20th May , 2024 Quorum: The Hon’ble JUSTICE AMIT MAH
Delhi HC dismisses appeal; Upholds daughter’s Class I inheritance rights.
CASE TITLE – Ms. Veeneta (Since Deceased) Through Lrs. v. Ms. Jyoti Gupta CASE NUMBER – FAO(OS) 143/2023 & C.M.Nos.67425-67426/2023 DATED O
SC criticizes HC ruling in Terrorism conspiracy case: Also clarified for charge under section 18 of UAPA, showing involvement in the actual commission of a terrorist act under Section 15 of UAPA is not necessary.
CASE TITLE – Union of India v. Barakathulla Etc. CASE NUMBER – CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2715 – 2719 OF 2024 DATED ON – 22.05.2024 QUORUM
Delhi HC uses ‘doctrine of harmonious construction’; Clarifies forum for appeals in government employee misconduct cases.
CASE TITLE – Khajan Singh v. Union of India and Ors. CASE NUMBER – W.P.(C) 15201/2023, CM APPL. 27067/2024 & W.P.(C) 6465/2024, CM APPL. 26
