Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Interstate boundary dispute between State of Uttar Pradesh and State of Haryana to be settled with utmost promptitude: Punjab High Court.
Interstate boundary dispute between State of Uttar Pradesh and State of Haryana to be settled with utmost promptitude: Punjab High Court.

The Punjab High Court, in DHARAMPAL V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS (CWP-9015-2023), held that utmost promptitude must be exercised by officials of

Section 300-A upheld as a constitutional right: Punjab High Court.
Section 300-A upheld as a constitutional right: Punjab High Court.

The Punjab High Court in Paramjit Kaur v/s State of Punjab and others (CWP-1612 of 2020), delivered on 3rd May 2023, held that pension was a consti

EVERY ENTRY IN ACR OF A PUBLIC SERVANT MUST BE COMMUNICATED TO HIM WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD IS LEGALLY SOUND AND HELPS IN ACHIEVING THREEFOLD OBJECTIVES: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
EVERY ENTRY IN ACR OF A PUBLIC SERVANT MUST BE COMMUNICATED TO HIM WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD IS LEGALLY SOUND AND HELPS IN ACHIEVING THREEFOLD OBJECTIVES: TELANGANA HIGH COURT

  The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on  24.04.2023  stating that every entry in ACR of a public servant must be communicated to

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS ENCOURAGING MEDIATION TO RESOLVE DISPUTERS AND IS KEEN TO MAKE RESORT TO MEDIATION AS MANDATORY: TELANGANA HIGH COURT
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS ENCOURAGING MEDIATION TO RESOLVE DISPUTERS AND IS KEEN TO MAKE RESORT TO MEDIATION AS MANDATORY: TELANGANA HIGH COURT

The High Court of Telangana passed a judgment on 21 April 2023, stating that Government of India is encouraging mediation to resolve disputers and

Calcutta High Court Invokes Power Under Article 133(1)(A) R/W Article 134A Of The Constitution
Calcutta High Court Invokes Power Under Article 133(1)(A) R/W Article 134A Of The Constitution

The bench of Justice Shekhar B Saraf of the High Court of Calcutta in the case of State of West Bengal v. Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Limited

‘The Petitioners May Hold Their Demonstration At Sahid Minar For 12 Days.’ : Calcutta HC
‘The Petitioners May Hold Their Demonstration At Sahid Minar For 12 Days.’ : Calcutta HC

The bench of Justice Rajashekhar Mantha of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. The State of West Bengal (WP

Inability To Pay A Portion Of The Price Of Goods Purchased By Him Cannot Give Rise To A Criminal Prosecution
Inability To Pay A Portion Of The Price Of Goods Purchased By Him Cannot Give Rise To A Criminal Prosecution

On Monday, the single judge bench consisting of Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Girish Lahoti v. Firdous Ala

‘The Insurance Policy And The Precedents On The Subject Do Not Permit Interpreting Any Disease Caused By A Mosquito Bite As An Accident.’: Calcutta HC
‘The Insurance Policy And The Precedents On The Subject Do Not Permit Interpreting Any Disease Caused By A Mosquito Bite As An Accident.’: Calcutta HC

The single judge of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya of the Chitra Mukherjee v. Union of India (WPA 103 of 2023) Calcutta High Court in the case of ha

Karnataka High court grants bail in assault and theft case
Karnataka High court grants bail in assault and theft case

Ramesh And Ors vs The State  9 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble Ramachandra D. Huddar   Introduction:- In the case with the petition number CRL.P No. 2

Bail must be granted to meet ends of justice: Karnataka High Court
Bail must be granted to meet ends of justice: Karnataka High Court

  Shivasharanappa  vs The State Of Karnataka 9 May, 2023 Bench: Hon’ble Ramachandra D. Huddar     Introduction In the case of Shivasharanappa