Address:Prime Legal, 39/2, 2nd floor, K G Road, Bengaluru 560009
Emailsupport@primelegal.in
Call now: 97400 13535
 

Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Karnataka High Court Denies Plea to Quash FIR Against Gynecologist under Section 21 of POCSO Act for Failure to Report Sexual Assault on a Minor
Karnataka High Court Denies Plea to Quash FIR Against Gynecologist under Section 21 of POCSO Act for Failure to Report Sexual Assault on a Minor
June 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Karnataka High Court Chandrashekar T.B. v. State of Karnataka & Devika Bench-  HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.8789

CONTINUE READING
Ensuring Social and Psychological Contact: Karnataka High Court Stresses Sufficient Visitation Rights for Parents Losing Child’s Custody
Ensuring Social and Psychological Contact: Karnataka High Court Stresses Sufficient Visitation Rights for Parents Losing Child’s Custody
June 8, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Karnataka High Court Mahesh d. Yatnalli v. State of Karnataka, R. Sujatha @ Saraswati & ors. Bench- THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE A

CONTINUE READING
LEGAL JUDGMENT ANALYSIS: CRIMINAL CASE AND PROPERTY DISPUTE IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT
LEGAL JUDGMENT ANALYSIS: CRIMINAL CASE AND PROPERTY DISPUTE IN BOMBAY HIGH COURT
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay: Aurangabad Bench passed a judgement on 06 June 2023. In the case of SAGAR SURESH MUNDLIK AND ANOTHER Vs TH

CONTINUE READING
EXAMINING INTERCONNECTED LEGAL CASES: COMMON PARTIES, SHARED FACTS, AND DIVERGING OUTCOMES:BOMBAY HIGH COURT
EXAMINING INTERCONNECTED LEGAL CASES: COMMON PARTIES, SHARED FACTS, AND DIVERGING OUTCOMES:BOMBAY HIGH COURT
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay: Aurangabad Bench passed a judgement on 06 June 2023. In the case of KAILASH BABURAO MAIND Vs THE STATE OF

CONTINUE READING
Unless and until, there is sufficient material to prove that a person has become a threat and menace to the Society, he cannot fall within the ambit of section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985: Gujarat High court
Unless and until, there is sufficient material to prove that a person has become a threat and menace to the Society, he cannot fall within the ambit of section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985: Gujarat High court
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Rohit S/O Bhaidas Pawar vs State Of Gujarat on 21 April, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice A.S. Supehia R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2773 of 2023 I

CONTINUE READING
An employee engaged for the same work, cannot be paid less than another, who performs the same duties and responsibilities: Gujarat High Court dismisses appeal
An employee engaged for the same work, cannot be paid less than another, who performs the same duties and responsibilities: Gujarat High Court dismisses appeal
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Vice Chancellor vs Amulaben Narendrabhai Nimavat on 17 April, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8816

CONTINUE READING
Andhra Pradesh High court disposed of the writ petition directing the Commissioner to conduct auction among the 7 applicants who have applied for lease and then lease out the exhibition ground to the successful bidder according to law.
Andhra Pradesh High court disposed of the writ petition directing the Commissioner to conduct auction among the 7 applicants who have applied for lease and then lease out the exhibition ground to the successful bidder according to law.
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati The Kurnool Exhibition Society vs The State of AP BENCH – HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR

CONTINUE READING
Petitioner prays to direct the respondent authorities to set the detenue at liberty in Andhra Pradesh High court.
Petitioner prays to direct the respondent authorities to set the detenue at liberty in Andhra Pradesh High court.
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Meka Venkateswaramma vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh BENCH – THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.

CONTINUE READING
Importance of Timing: Filing Section 498A Complaint After Husband’s Demand for Divorce Cannot Be Grounds for Quashing, Affirms Karnataka High Court
Importance of Timing: Filing Section 498A Complaint After Husband’s Demand for Divorce Cannot Be Grounds for Quashing, Affirms Karnataka High Court
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Karnataka High Court Pramod R. S v. State of Karnataka and Lakshmi M.R  Bench- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1511

CONTINUE READING
The Power of the Arbitrator: Resolving Disputes in Partnerships through the Clauses of the Partnership Deed – Insights from the Karnataka High Court
The Power of the Arbitrator: Resolving Disputes in Partnerships through the Clauses of the Partnership Deed – Insights from the Karnataka High Court
June 7, 2023by Primelegal Team0

Karnataka High Court Jameela v. Sullia Afsa @ Hafsa.B & ors. Bench- HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT  CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO.500 OF 2021 D

CONTINUE READING

    Prime Legal Law Firm

    We at Prime Legal, aim to achieve justice for all our clients by providing individual attention and dedicated legal support. We always prioritize confidentiality and ensure our clients' legal needs are met with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity.