Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
S.91 CrPC: Karnataka High Court Rules that Correspondence Between Investigating Officer and Senior Officers Not Part of Chargesheet and Cannot be Summoned
S.91 CrPC: Karnataka High Court Rules that Correspondence Between Investigating Officer and Senior Officers Not Part of Chargesheet and Cannot be Summoned

Karnataka High Court Shri siddappa B. H.  v.  State of Karnataka & Devika Bench- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2954

WRIT PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT TO PASS INTERIM ORDERS AGAINST RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT TO PASS INTERIM ORDERS AGAINST RESPONDENTS

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Suryadevara Jayaprada vs The State of Andhra Pradesh BENCH – THE HON’BLE DUPPALA VENKATA RAM

CRIMINAL PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS
CRIMINAL PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Podili Rattamma vs The State of Andhra Pradesh BENCH – THE HON’BLE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA CR

Fresh circular on the dress code of judicial officers, Delhi high court
Fresh circular on the dress code of judicial officers, Delhi high court

No.96/Rules/DHC                                                                  

The High Court exercising supervisory jurisdiction does not act as a court of first appeal to reweigh the evidence or facts upon which the determination under challenge is based: Gujarat High Court
The High Court exercising supervisory jurisdiction does not act as a court of first appeal to reweigh the evidence or facts upon which the determination under challenge is based: Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Sidhee Cement Ltd vs Legal Heirs Of Lakha Bijal Bench: Honourable Justice Sandeep N. Bhatt JUDGMENT DATED: 03/05/2023 R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLI

When the appellant himself has admitted to parting with the possession of property, it is not necessary to prove it in Court: Gujarat High Court
When the appellant himself has admitted to parting with the possession of property, it is not necessary to prove it in Court: Gujarat High Court

Kiran Ramanlal Inamdar vs Gujarat Housing Board on 4 May, 2023 Bench: Honourable Justice Rajendra M. Sareen R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 104 of 2023 By way

THE IMPUGNED EXTERNMENT ORDER SUFFERS FROM THE VICE OF IMPOSING UNREASONABLE RESTRICTIONS WITHOUT RECORDING ANY REASONS OR SUBJECTIVE SATISFACTION AND, THEREFORE, IT IS LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
THE IMPUGNED EXTERNMENT ORDER SUFFERS FROM THE VICE OF IMPOSING UNREASONABLE RESTRICTIONS WITHOUT RECORDING ANY REASONS OR SUBJECTIVE SATISFACTION AND, THEREFORE, IT IS LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

INTRODUCTION The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 05 June 2023. In the case of SMT. AJAY RAM THORAT Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. IN C

COMPENSATION GRANTED IN RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL CASE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
COMPENSATION GRANTED IN RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL CASE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT

INTRODUCTION:  The High Court of Bombay passed a judgement on 07 June 2023. In the case of SMT. KAMLABAI WD/O MAHADEORAO RAUT Vs UNION OF INDIA,

WRIT PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT TO RELEASE THE DETENUE
WRIT PETITION FILED IN ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT TO RELEASE THE DETENUE

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Mekala Puspha Reddy vs The State of AP BENCH – THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU A

Criminal petition filed for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner in Andhra Pradesh High Court.
Criminal petition filed for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner in Andhra Pradesh High Court.

Andhra Pradesh High Court – Amravati Bheemireddy Uma Maheswari vs The State Of A.P BENCH – HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MIS