Facts This appeal arises out of Section 19(1)(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, read with Section 151 CPC, 1908, associated with the order dated 0
Facts This appeal arises out of Section 19(1)(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, read with Section 151 CPC, 1908, associated with the order dated 0
Facts The Saurabh Srivastava (Revisionist) married to opposite party no.2 on 14.12.2014 according to Hindu rites and rituals at Lucknow. Out the
Facts The petitioner, Ankush Kumar Parashar was married to respondent no. 1 Sapna @ Mona on 2nd July, 2017 as per Hindu rites. A son, Master
Introduction The Supreme Court has demarcated the limits to framing an additional substantive question of law in a second appeal preferred u
Introduction The term family often appear in a daily life, but in a law its interpretation can become matter of dispute with far reaching
Introduction The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that it is the sole discretion of the temple authorities to decide on VIP status at the
Case Name: SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI VERSUS HARE RAM SAH & ORS Case Number: SLP(Crl.) No. 18377 of 2024 Date: Monday, the First Day of September, T
Case Name: Devendra Nath Tripathi v. Union of India & Ors. Case number: WRIT PETITION NO. 1549 OF 2017 Date: Monday, the twenty-fifth day of Au
Case Name: Additional Director General Adjudication, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence versus Suresh Kumar and Co. Impex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Co
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Gradually promoting the Constitution’s promise of a democratic system, the Hon’ble Manipur High Court ruled