Supreme Court grants Maharashtra domicile candidate admission despite parent’s deployment.
Case title: Vansh S/O Prakash Dolas v. The Ministry of Education & The Ministry of Health & Family Welfare & Ors. Case no.: Civil Appea
The transport of the Kolhapur elephant to Jamnagar is stopped temporarily by the intervention of the Bombay High Court
Case Title:- Swasthishri Jinsen Bhattark Pattacharya,Mahaswami Sanstha Math (Karveer) Versus Union of India and Ors. Case No:- Writ Petition No. 37
Supreme Court upholds defendants’ title over property due to plaintiff’s failure to prove adverse possession
Case title: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V Sandhya and Anr. Case no.: Civil Appeals @ SLP No. 19059-61 of 2014. Decided on: 18.03.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Ju
Supreme Court grants compensation to an army personnel for wrongful termination and misdiagnosis.
Case title: Satyanand Singh vs. Union of India & Ors Case no.: Civil Appeal No. 1666 of 2015 Decided on: 18.03.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice S
SC issues guidelines for dealing with Habeas Corpus petition involving LGBTQ+ community
Case title – Devu G Nair Vs The State of Kerala & Ors. Case no. – Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No 1891 of 2023 Decision on – March 1
The Supreme Court outlined relevant factors to modify the sentence imposed on the accused under Section 302 of IPC
Case title – Navas @ Mulanavas Vs State of Kerala Case no. – Criminal Appeal No. 1215 OF 2011 Decision on – March 18th, 2024 Quoram – Justi
Reassessment proceedings against Castrol India initiated due to change in opinion are quashed by the Bombay High Court
Case Title:- Castrol Indian Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-1(2)(1), Mumbai and others Case No: Writ Petition No.3079 OF 20
Supreme Court noted that according to the Maharashtra Revenue Patels (Abolition of Offices) Act, tenants who held watan property on “Tiller’s Day” would be eligible to buy watan property
Case Title: Baban Balaji More(Dead) by LRs. & others versus Babaji Hari Shelar(Dead) by LRs. & others Case No: Civil Appeal No.9356 of 2017
Delhi HC: The accused’s “arrest” or “custody” is a prerequisite for the application of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.
Case Title : Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Dura Line India Pvt. Ltd. (DIPL) & Ors. Case No: CC No. 272/2022 Quorum: Honorable Justice N
Reexamining the notion that time is not the essence of a contract involving immovable property is necessary: Karnataka High Court
Case No: 406/2007. Facts of the case:- The Plaintiff commenced legal proceedings to enforce the 20.07.2006 sale agreement by specific execution of
