Blogs And Articles

By the team of Prime Legal
Sale of narcotic drug on credit is different from financing the activity of sale of narcotic drug: Bombay High Court
Sale of narcotic drug on credit is different from financing the activity of sale of narcotic drug: Bombay High Court

The expression ‘financing of a narcotic drug’ is not related to the payment of the value of the narcotic drug. It is rather an activity that in

Freedom of Media to report Court proceedings integral to hold Judiciary accountable: Supreme Court

While hearing an SLP on restricting the reporting of media, the Supreme Court upheld that freedom of speech and expression of media is crucial in e

Under S.37 of NDPS Act, onus on petitioner to prove not guilty and not likely to commit offence on bail: Himachal Pradesh High Court

While deciding a bail petition under the Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, for a case under section 37 of the act, the onus is on peti

Court of Appeal cannot indulge in fact-finding of first instance in any given case: Delhi High Court
Court of Appeal cannot indulge in fact-finding of first instance in any given case: Delhi High Court

It is undisputed that a court that acts under an appellate jurisdiction cannot indulge in the fact-finding procedure of trial courts. This accepted

Health insurance claim agents to be considered as rendering essential services whilst lockdown: Delhi High Court

The present petition before the Delhi High Court deals with mobility issues arising out of the current Covid-19 scenario in India where numerous st

Useless Formality theory is an exception and must not be readily resorted in all cases: High Court of Delhi
Useless Formality theory is an exception and must not be readily resorted in all cases: High Court of Delhi

The right of a person in detention to consult a legal practitioner of his choice is a right guaranteed by the Constitution of India and it is not o

Sub-rule (9) of Rule-6 of the High Court of Orissa (Designation of Senior Advocate) Rules, 2019 is ultra-vires: High Court of Orissa

Hon’ble the Supreme Court in paragraph- 73.4 of Indira Jaising case has ipse dixit not stated anything about the pick through suo motu source. Su

Mere recovery of tainted money without any proof of demand not sufficient to constitute the offence punishable U/S. 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act: Jharkhand High Court

Illegal gratification is a sine qua non to constitute the said offence and mere recovery of currency notes cannot constitute the offence under Sect

Officers invested with powers U/S.53 of the NDPS Act are “police officers” within the meaning of S.25 IEA: Jharkhand High Court

Officers who have been given powers under section 53 of the NDPS Act are “police officers” within the scope of section 25 of the Eviden

No evidence adduced by the defence to prove false implication of the appellants, hence conviction stands justified: Chhattisgarh High Court

It stands proved beyond all reasonable doubt that it is the accused/appellants who, quarreled with the complainant, abused him filthily in the name