No Bail in case of Serious and Heinous Offences: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu
Where there is a charge for a heinous and serious offence, there is no reason for the Court to grant bail, as observed by the High Court of Jammu &
Validity of caste certificate considered afresh in favour of the appellant: Supreme Court of India.
Setting aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court Hon’ble M. R. Shah, J in the case of Rushikesh Bharat Garud vs. The State
Captive users are not liable to pay the additional surcharge levied under Section 42(4) of the Electricity Act, 2003: Supreme Court of India
So far as the captive consumers / captive users are concerned, they are not liable to pay the additional surcharge under Section 42(4) of the Act,
Land Acquisition Act,1894- Guesswork involved in fixation of market value is to be made by adopting well-recognized methods: Supreme Court of India.
It is well settled that fixation of market value in a Reference under Section 18(1) of the Land Acquisition Act,1894 necessarily involves some gues
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is not intended for Recovery, Existence of a Real Dispute excludes its Invocation: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
The necessity to limit the application of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and prevent the use of the statute as a means of recovery of su
If evidence of eye-witness is contrary to the FIR, no weightage can be given to the FIR: Supreme Court of India
It is noted that PW-1 was traveling in the same car and PW–3, who has given a statement before the police, was examined as eye–witness. In view
Mere Supply of Grounds of Imprisonment Insufficient in absence of Other Material: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar
Detention of a detenu is vitiated if material in the shape of grounds of detention with no other material or documents, as referred to in the order
Mere Excuse of Procedural Aspect is no Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu
Merely saying that the delay was on account of procedural aspect, is not sufficient cause to condone the delay, as observed by the High Court of Ja
Grant of Regular Bail – Third Bail Application also Rejected : Chhattisgarh High Court
The High Court of Chhattisgarh upheld that when court cannot find any undue delay caused by the trial Court in case of bail rejection, court is n
Until Verification of Facts – Interim Protection Ensuring That No Demolition Work is Carried Out – No Coercive Steps: Chhattisgarh High Court
Interim protection ensuring that no demolition work is carried out in property that need verification of facts to meet ends of justice is upheld
