Unexplained delay on the part of the Petitioner in filing the writ petition.: High Court of Delhi
This so-called Public Interest Litigation after looking into facts seems to be a revenge taking type of writ petition upheld by High Court of Delhi
Plaintiff must lead evidence first when the defendant do not admit to the facts pleaded by the plaintiff: High Court of Delhi
It is the general rule that the plaintiff must lead evidence first, however, when the defendant admits to the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, the p
Present petition is in the nature of private interest litigation and not public interest litigation: High Court of Patna
The petitioner has an alternative remedy for issuance of writ of mandamus to remove the encroachment under the provisions of the Bihar Public Land
The intention was not to commit the murder of the deceased but the same had occurred in an attempt to commit theft: High Court Of Bombay
The accused appellant Sunil Kharwar is convicted for offence punishable under section 397 of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer 10 ye
If Civil Court is approached for a plea relating to trademark then such plea will not be decided by the civil court but by the Tribunal: High Court of Delhi
In the event the Civil Court is approached, inter alia, raising the issue of invalidity of the trade mark such plea will be decided not by the civi
Extension of the time for preparing and pronouncing the Award by the Arbitral Tribunal due to nationwide lockdown : High Court of Delhi
Court can extend the time to conclude the arbitral proceedings for pronouncing the Award by the Arbitral Tribunal keeping in view nationwide lockdo
A person shall not be entitled for payment of salary for the period that he has not worked : High Court of Delhi
Petitioner shall not be entitled for payment of salary for the period that he has not worked i.e. from the date of removal of service till the date
Power vests with the Central Government in terms of Section 15 of the Architects Act of 1972 to recognise a degree awarded by a Foreign University: HIGH COURT OF DELHI
The power ultimately vests with the Central Government in consultation with the respondent No.1 in terms of Section 15 of the Act of 1972 to recogn
The conviction of the appellant recorded by the Trial Court under Section 302 IPC is set aside: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
There is a reasonable doubt in the case of the prosecution and it is not proper to uphold the conviction of the appellant on the basis of aforesaid
Time limit to pass the rectification order in terms of Section 154(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is six months: High Court of Delhi
Present writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the Respondents to decide the rectification application filed by the petitioner under Sec
